There was a thing in the late 70s/early 80s for 25” frames like that. The top tubes are not especially long. You rode them with very little seat post showing. No idea why....Lovely bike. I think it looks big because the frame is so skinny. Alternatively, it might be huge!
There was a thing in the late 70s/early 80s for 25” frames like that. The top tubes are not especially long. You rode them with very little seat post showing. No idea why....
:-). There are a lot of bikes like the Raleigh Record Sprint (black and gold) and Dawes too of that era in humongous frame sizes....and many still around. At 5’9” I could still ride them OK.Very true, my 60cms Peugeot is rideable, considering I usually ride a 51cms road bike (I’m 5’8”) back then the style was not for a huge seat tube to be on show, in fact the original seat tubes are cut quite short.
View attachment 519782
I suspect they're like hens teeth these days. Sort of an early freehub arrangement iirc.@shhh967 I think you will have to change the rear wheel as not sure those helimatic hubs can be fitted with a single gear
Ah, the old Heavy Lead Extrusion frame.
Actually, they're weren't bad at all. Much livelier feeling than the Raleigh 18-23 jobs.