mjr
Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
- Location
- mostly Norfolk, sometimes Somerset
Thanks for that explanation. I'll just answer the question and refute some suggestions.
They're flat handlebars which are notorious for putting the hands in an unergonomic position and straining things on bumpy urban roads. Many riders add bar-ends to offer a better second alternative position and some change to swept bars of some sort that offer multiple hand positions, with the main position (with the brakes/shifters) being more ergonomic.I fail similarly fail to see why the Pinnacle's handlebars would need replacement with "comfortable" ones?
I suggest that unless you're adding lightweight low-capacity racks and flimsy mudguards, there isn't much between a hybrid and a roadster, despite roadsters having the reputation for being heavy. My own hybrid weighs in between my lightweight roadster (solid guards but low-capacity rack) and my main roadster (even more solid guards and a passenger-carrying rack) all within about 2kg.A rack and mudguards can be added at purchase for models of the buyer's choice which suited her needs. That would make the bike somewhat heavier, but one would suggest still significantly lighter than the type of bike you are suggesting.
Not far enough below to pay for the missing mudguards and rack, though, so effectively comparing a more expensive hybrid and still not like for like.Gear ranges, yes, a hub gear's wider than the P1, but the bikes you list are at a more elevated price point so of course we're not comparing like-for-like. Let's have a look at the Pinnacle 3, still at a pricepoint below the models you cited: https://www.evanscycles.com/pinnacle-lithium-3-womens-2016-hybrid-bike-EV244095
I think roadsters have much more touring-friendly features than those hybrids.OP, hope that helps, as I indicated, this might not be the type of bike for you, but might be worth a look, especially if you want a model that has the capability to take you cycling elsewhere than the urban jungle.