does anyone elses feet touch their front wheel when turning
There are British Standards for bicycle safety and for the bike (as opposed to lighting) it was BS6102/1
Trouble is that these BS (and the standards / ENs that replaced them when original withdrawn) cannot be accessed without payment. However there is a useful info work-around.
Cycling UK (was CTC) Standard for Hired & Used Cycles
"Since BS6102/1 applies only to brand-new, unused bicycles, there has long been a desire for some yardstick against which to asses the safety and roadworthiness of a bicycle that's already seen a bit of wear and tear. This desire for a kind of cycling MOT became a necessity in conjunction with the CTC Cycle Hire Code, so CTC [Chris Juden was author)] answered it with
a specification, broadly
based upon BS6102/1."
"5 Steering
"5.1 Free movement
"The steering shall be free to turn through at least 60° either side of straight-ahead. Slight
stiffness shall be accepted, provided that the steering is free enough for the weight of the
front fork and wheel etc. to turn it when the cycle is leaned at up to 45° to one side or the
other (wheels not touching the ground).
"As the steering is turned and as the cycle is pedalled it shall not be possible for the toe of a
rider’s shoe, when 110mm in front of the centre of either pedal, to touch the front wheel or
mudguard."
My size 9½ shoes extend 108mm in front of the pedal spindle (NB I have the SPD-R cleats set back as far as they will go). My crank length is 170mm. My mudguards, over 28-622 tyres, extend 353mm from the front wheel axle and the clearance is dead on 108mm. My mudguard, when the wheel is turned, may brush the toe of my shoe (but I always assume it will). The bike frame(57/58) has a wheelbase of 1018mm and BB to front axle is 610mm.
absolutely nothing to do with frame size. My Viscount is a massive 25" frame and still suffers slightly from toe overlap.
I must admit I'm surprised that that size frame hasn't got a longer wheelbase. Have you got 'massive' feet as well?