Interestingly it is possible (in hindsight) to have picked a maximum points team from 8 of the top nine riders - usually the points cost of hte best riders s is way too high, but by swapping Valdeverde for Coquard you'll have a squad of nine and the best achievable score of 11471 unless I've got my maths wrong.
Probably often it's very possible to make teams that score much better than the maximum allowed cost and have have better score (that's the power of hindsight
)
But don't forget you're forced to stay within the rider categories
(i.e. you need 3 "helpers" and the 3 best helpers are not scoring as high as some of the sprinters, allrounders or climbers)
Curious by your message, had a quick look (so don't shoot me if I have 1 wrong) and I believe this was the best combo
All-rounder:
Nibali 2471p (16)
Peraud 1386p (6)
Climber:
Pinot 1264p (8)
Bardet 1061p (10)
Sprinter;
Sagan 1561p (18)
Unclassified:
Coquard 783p (6)
Renshaw 624p (6)
Navardauskas 550p (6)
Joker:
Valverde 1075p (16)
Delivering 10775 points for only a cost of 92
Only making 1 team, I would have never had the nerve to make a team without either Froome or Contador (in my case the choice was easily to go for Bertie)
Renshaw is for me the biggest surprise to see in the above list (but Cav dropping out in stage 1 of course has greatly impacted that)