There were some seriously fit people doing it sub 4hrs (I think 3:39 was first, I was 4:21) but other people took it at their own pace and done it in around 6hrs +. Course wise its fairly easy mostly flat, except for Schiehallion and even that was a gentle climb. I don't think it'd be harder than the recent 50 miler. The bigger pack also makes it easier you get sucked along.magnatom said:Hmmm. Had a look at this one. Probably one I'd be best leaving until next year. How would it compare to our little recent 50 miler?
HLaB said:There were some seriously fit people doing it sub 4hrs (I think 3:39 was first, I was 4:21) but other people took it at their own pace and done it in around 6hrs +. Course wise its fairly easy mostly flat, except for Schiehallion and even that was a gentle climb. I don't think it'd be harder than the recent 50 miler. The bigger pack also makes it easier you get sucked along.
It is quite early in the year so its always when my fitness is not the best.magnatom said:I'll probably leave it until next year, when I have a few more miles in my legs!
Alves said:It is quite early in the year so its always when my fitness is not the best.
I'm hoping it'll be a good training run.Noodley said:Would now be a bad time to remind you that you, I, MercuryKev and a few others shall be riding a 400km the week before the Etape?
HLaB said:According to the local paper, 2700 have signed up so far and they will have to cap it to 3500 its so popular.
I don't think I will, my cam weighs nearly as much as my bike, its about as aerodynamic as a brick and my card would be full 1/2 way but it'll be nice to see your footage , 4 hours in to 10 mins will be quite a challenge . Not that it'll make much difference but 10:59 is the youtube limit, I've uploaded 10:58.LeeW said:I wonder if anyone else is gonna take a helmet cam? I'm thinking of taking one. I will edit the footage down to about 10 mins and pop it on the you tube.