Ming the Merciless
There is no mercy
- Location
- Inside my skull
£4300 next year for anyone not on the new means tested Price Guarantee.
There is no total cap such as you posit here. Bills can and will go well beyond £4,300 for many.
£4300 next year for anyone not on the new means tested Price Guarantee.
It's quite frightening how this whole thing has been handled & publishedThere is no total cap such as you posit here. Bills can and will go well beyond £4,300 for many.
It's quite frightening how this whole thing has been handled & published
There is no total cap such as you posit here. Bills can and will go well beyond £4,300 for many.
It's quite frightening how this whole thing has been handled & published
There is no actual £4300 ofgem rate, as its being capped by the UK government at £3000, so it just means the energy companies will set the rate for £4300, government will pay the difference between that rate and the rate for £3000
Something like that anyway
There is no actual £4300 ofgem rate, as its being capped by the UK government at £3000, so it just means the energy companies will set the rate for £4300, government will pay the difference between that rate and the rate for £3000
Something like that anyway
No no no, there’s no cap of this sort at all. There’s just a cap on the unit rate, no overall cap on bills.
Something not very like that, in spite of what we keep getting told.
There is NO cap on overall bill. It isn't £3000 or £4300 or anything else.
And the"actual OFGEM rate" is the one which means a "typical" household would pay £4300. The Energy Price Guarantee is the government set value - and you are right that the government will pay the energy companies the difference between the EPG and the OFGEM rate.
This "typical" household is just based on the median value across the country of usage (dual fuel), and the average EPG unit price (the actual unit price will vary by region, hence using the average).
For actually predicting what most people are likely to pay, the median is slightly better than the mean, but the mode would have been even better.
again i never said there was and i did say rate around four times in the post......
You never mentioned "unit rate", and without the "unit", the word rate has little meaning in that context.
It would be far better if this "typical" household was quantified, the "typical" household uses X amount of Electricity per year the "typical" household uses X amount of Gas per year, as it it is it's just numbers in the sky.