RichardB
Slightly retro
- Location
- West Wales
I think the rot set in once they stopped building lugged 531 Galaxy frames with horizontal top tubes. The same can be said for the Raleigh Royal/Randonneur. A large part of the touring market is ultra-conservative and lugged lightweight steel is what those buyers wanted. By attempting to force the buyers into adopting a new style of bike they didn't particularly want, all the manufacturers achieved is to put those customers off buying any kind of bike from them. All that will happen is those customers will occasionally purchase a new wheelset and replace some worn drivetrain parts, and simply keep using their old 531 frames, which are not going to wear out.
This is me exactly. In my youth, a Galaxy (or, even better, a Super Galaxy) was the aspirational tourer bar none. In the early 90s I even bought one (and a matching one for the Mrs). It was a fantastic bike. Shame, but I sold it (long story, medical issues).
When I wanted a touring bike a few years ago, I looked for another. LBS had a Galaxy Chromo (the steel frame was no longer the mainstream offering, which should have been a warning) and I bought it. I was a bit suckered in there - I read 'designed in Britain' and not the unsaid corollary 'made in Thailand', and it was a bit of a surprise when I discovered that Dawes were no longer 'hand built in Britain' as my 1990s model boasted. My fault, but disappointing. It was a nice enough bike, rode quite well, nice touches like a set of spokes fastened to the rear stays. But it just didn't have the pzzazz of the original. I didn't like the sloping top tube, and couldn't get on with the STI levers. Touring bikes should be, as far as possible, simple, robust and field-repairable, and STI seemed an unnecessary complication for little benefit. I didn't bond with it, and returned it to the shop at a small loss.