Drago
Legendary Member
- Location
- Suburban Poshshire
Don't click that link. Take it from me, once read it can't be unread!
While I think I see your point, a bit, I remain cautious about any tendency to blame cyclists for their own misfortune on the basis of what they're wearing. Also, "vehicular cycling" - which is in many places still the only kind of cycling which is currently practical - is a whole lot easier when the cyclist is moving at vehicular speeds.I can't help feeling that cycling wouldn't automatically be seen by some people as 'a hobby' if there were less emphasis on wearing the right lycra+helmet uniform and riding the right carbon bike, and more acceptance of cycling as a cheap, inclusive and environmentally friendly form of transport (as in, e.g., Holland). Sorry if that sounds a little like 'we brought it on ourselves', but ... maybe some of us did a bit?
I can't help feeling that cycling wouldn't automatically be seen by some people as 'a hobby' if there were less emphasis on wearing the right lycra+helmet uniform and riding the right carbon bike, and more acceptance of cycling as a cheap, inclusive and environmentally friendly form of transport (as in, e.g., Holland). Sorry if that sounds a little like 'we brought it on ourselves', but ... maybe some of us did a bit?
I think you may have forgotten how boring taking the bus is. Riding a city bike is still riding and still feels marvellous. You won't get the sportstyle rush of speed, but the rest is all still good.If I had to commute to work on the "sturdy family bike" it'd be almost as boring as taking the bus, and without even the attraction of being able to read a book on the journey
You are entirely correct! I do have a 20 to 30 year old Raleigh rigid which I occasionally use when I can't be bothered locking up the good one but I just prefer my road bike, and if I'm going far it's going to be in the right equipment.If your bike isn't comfortable to ride in ordinary clothes for distance, it's probably the cycling equivalent of
I know I joke that Specialized is the boring equivalent of Ford cars, but the real equivalent, the sturdy family bike, is disappointingly rare on our streets. Imagine if motoring transport policy was dominated by open top sports cars drivers and the politicians mostly thought of sports cars but had as little experience of using them as they currently do. It complicates things.
I'm not sure, but I have felt it's a problem among councillors and council officers, with some crud-for-cycling designs excused with a daft claim like that most adult cyclists are sports ones who will use roads no matter how hostile they are so the design only needs to cater to 8-year-olds who like a challenge (when it would be better to design the cycle routes to be attractive for all).I do see the sentiment behind your argument but I don't think the majority of the non-cycling public view cycling solely as a sport, do they look at people weaving through rush hour traffic in cities and relate them to the MAMIL?
I think you're right, after commenting to an official regarding the numerous short comings and hazards on a 2 mile stretch of joint user path, the official boasted that he was not a cyclist but had managed to cycle the length of the path unscathed, therefore it would have presented no problems for anyone who claimed to be a cyclist and that would be the end of any discussion re path improvement .I'm not sure, but I have felt it's a problem among councillors and council officers, with some crud-for-cycling designs excused with a daft claim like that most adult cyclists are sports ones.
while going through red lights and riding on the pavement. At the same timeStuck in a traffic jams, probably caused by cyclists, they can only go 5 mph and hold everyone up.