ok - I'm feeling spectacularly sunny (I'm just off to Box Hill on my lovely new bike) and a little contrite - so here it is (again).
I still live in hope of starting a thread in P+L that the usual bores can't turn to mush, though...
For the last thirtyfive years I have worn the same underpants. Well, not the same underpants exactly, but underpants to the same design. White Y-fronts. I dallied with little stretchy jobs in the late sixties, and I have tried boxers, but, being massively well endowed, I need the support of a proper pair of men's pants. Something with a bit of structure.
I generally buy half a dozen pairs of pants at a time, and discard them when they get too stretched, or fray around the edges.
This morning I reached into the drawer and pulled forth a pair of pants slightly different from the rest. They had blue threading in the waist band. These hadn't seen the light of day for a while, but I recognised them straight away. These were, so to speak, the madeleine of pants. I remembered the frisson on seeing these pants being taken from a polished mahogany drawer at an outfitters in West Norwood -the kind of shop that one doesn't see these days, and was a rarity then. I'd gone to the outfitters out of nostalgia because it was there that my mother took me to buy my school uniform in about 1961. They sold plimsolls that smelt of rubber, and serge shorts that chafed your legs. This, mind you, for a school that these days would be described as 'stressed' or 'in an area of deprivation'.
The latter visit to the outfitters was in 1989. So these pants were nineteen years old. Those of you versed in atomic theory will know the meaning of 'half-life'. In such and such a time half of a particular isotope of a metal will become another, more stable isotope. It is exactly the same with pants. I'd imagine that half the pants I've purchased over the years have lasted eighteen months or less. Another half will have lasted between eighteen months and three years, and so on and so forth.... This, then was a pair of pants not just of exceptional longevity, but, on the face of it, one pair in 2 to the power of almost 13. The Methuselah of pants.
They'd seen trousers come and go. Gap jeans and chinos. Cords. Satin Armani jobbys. White linen, black linen, even a pair of dark green linen trousers with a tie waistband. All consigned to the recycling bin.
And now, the bad news. The pants of yore are no more. They've got a hole in them. A hole that wasn't there this morning. And so, when I take them off in half an hour's time, they will be ex-pants.
They have, by virtue of their longevity, become eco-pants. Prashant Kapoor who knows more about this stuff than anybody on the planet has suggested that cotton clothing is, pound for pound, the least sustainable purchase you can make. I have half a dozen shirts that I dare not throw away despite not having a clue what moved me to buy them, because Prashant (who is always impeccably turned out) would describe throwing away cotton clothing as a waste. When do you wear a pink shirt?
I can discard my eco-pants with a clear conscience. They've served their time, and they go to the Valhalla of Underwear secure in the knowledge, that, if ever we were to call upon a pair of pants to save the planet, then they, the Y-fronts with the blue threading in the waistband would be the ones we would call for. Eco-pants, I salute you!