Bromptonaut
Rohan Man
- Location
- Bugbrooke UK
Can you link to a report of case please?
He had right of way.So the verdict is in on the case of a "cyclist" charged with causing death by careless driving, and driving without a licence, on an illegally quick electric motorbike.
The only thing this has to do with cycling is that the electric motorbike started life as a bicycle before being illegally modified.
I am baffled how this particular uninsured individual was given not guilty verdict. Can anyone enlighten?
I don't think that is an absolute right.He had right of way.
Don't understand why you are conflicted unless you think "now it"s our turn to flatten people" . No difference between speeding unlicenced irresponsible folk guiding illegally modified vehicles in my book, whether on four or two wheels. The defence appears to have been based on the self serving junk some drivers tell themselves about their oh so wonderful driving skills.More reporting but no more sources yet at https://road.cc/content/news/271675...ing-london-pedestrians-death-careless-driving
That repeats the BBC report that he was not guilty of death-by-careless and driving-unlicensed, but I thought there was also an uninsured-motoring charge - do we know what happened to that?
This all feels a bit like a cyclist who did a few illegal but widespread mods has actually benefitted from the shoot that usually allows motorists to get away with killing cyclists too easily. Basically, the courts do not uphold the "Drive at a speed that will allow you to stop well within the distance you can see to be clear" from the Highway Code. I'm very conflicted about this case!