palinurus said:Two songwriters of the same baseline? How would you propose measuring how good a songwriter was? What would be the standard unit of songwriting prowess? (perhaps the James Blunt, there'd be 1000 of these to the Dylan perhaps?)
tomb1960 said:Are these people creative as a result of pharmacology or does their creativity drive them to experiment with pharmacology?.
I've always maintained that The Funk can be measured in milliBootsies.Two songwriters of the same baseline? How would you propose measuring how good a songwriter was? What would be the standard unit of songwriting prowess? (perhaps the James Blunt, there'd be 1000 of these to the Dylan perhaps?)
Big Bren said:Throughout history, creative people have experimented with mind-altering substances; always have, always will.
What's different today and intensely objectionable, is that the sad, self-destructive behaviour of a few famous alcoholics, bulimics and junkies has become newsworthy in and of itself, despite their obvious lack of talent or product.
It's all rather worrying - a few years ago, being a wino/junkie carried a huge amount of social stigma and would guarantee to remove the oxygen of publicity that these people need. Thesedays, it seems just fine and dandy and no impediment whatsoever to a hugely lucrative career in the 'entertainment' industry.
Bren
domtyler said:Some good points here, but can you let us know exactly which year it was
when "being a wino/junkie carried a huge amount of social stigma and would guarantee to remove the oxygen of publicity that these people need"? I'm curious as I cannot remember it.
domtyler said:Are you still there Bren?
Boy George springs to mind. Drugs wrecked his career. Anyone remember the notorious 'Junkie George Has Eight Weeks To Live' headline?domtyler said:No need to be on the offensive BB, just curious that's all. Can you let ME know who's career was wrecked in the eighties through taking drugs and drinking too much as I cannot seem to recall anyone? Thanks.