So do you think registration and training requirements would make any difference to the likes of him?
If not, why don't you have a problem with red tape gone mad that only serves to increase costs for law abiding users who weren't causing the problems anyway?
Like I said before, he'll probably have moved on to something else by then so I don't know what difference it would make to him.
My Phantom is available to anybody, of any age, over the counter, no experience or training required. It weighs just under 3lb and can travel at 35mph (the later model can reach 45mph) and has a communication range of about 3.75 miles.
Setting aside battery life, I could, if I was stupid enough, pilot my quadcopter to an altitude of 19,500 feet, putting a lot of people at risk. Even keeping within the CAA regulations, there is ample scope for poorly skilled pilots to cause serious injury to others. These are powerful and complex remote control aircraft and need to be handled properly.
It's not enough to stick an A6 leaflet in the box with a few bullet points of guidance and a link, nobody gives a shoot at that point. They want it powered up and flying ASAP, and all that stuff goes in the bin with the box. Having thousands of these randomly flying around public spaces will go wrong sooner than later, and it's my experience that most users don't bother to self-regulate or get adequate training.
If I were to make a comparison with bicycles and cars, I would liken these small aircraft to cars, needing training and registration commensurate with the potential for harm whereas anyone from 8 to 80 could fly a kite (or ride a bike) without restrictions, given the inherent harmlessness of that activity.
What's your view? Are you against further regulation? Do you have a drone?