smutchin
Cat 6 Racer
- Location
- The Red Enclave
I just wanted to open a debate over we are not 100% follow the recommendations that we sell with economic interests.
Simplest answer to that is not to trust anything you see in adverts - ie "scientific" advice from people with a product to sell. I've become a lot more sceptical of taking advice since reading Ben Goldacre's Bad Science.
On the specific subject of hydration, I think that most of us, most of the time, just respond to our body's signals - we feel thirsty, we have a drink. And those of us who cycle a lot, and cover very long distances (eg audax), tend to learn from experience what our body really needs. Perhaps this isn't the optimum approach, scientifically speaking, but since very few of us here are performance athletes, it possibly doesn't matter so much.
I often see fellow cyclists on rides measuring out their powders and potions, as if they are carrying out some highly precise scientific process, but I wonder how many, if any, of them really understand the science behind their energy drinks or if they've just been suckered in by advertising and cycling folklore.
Taking an individualistic approach is good advice. I certainly don't think any of us should just copy what the pros do, because their physiology and work rate are entirely different to us mere mortals.