I thought the cloud of suspicion had always hung over him.
Hmmm, I think there's a growing list of them but Sammy Sanchez was old skool.Easier to list who it doesn't hang over, isn't it?
Indeed. I was half expecting to see it was EPO rather than a GHRP.Hmmm, I think there's a growing list of them but Sammy Sanchez was old skool.
Cynic!Easier to list who it doesn't hang over, isn't it?
I can see what you mean about the racing but someone will, much as i'd like to think cycling will never have another doper someone always will.Cynic!
I'd be gutted if one of the young dudes on the block now, was nailed.
You can see by the manner of the racing that it's cleaner than it ever has been. The old skool and the desperate will still try though.
Hmmm, I think there's a growing list of them but Sammy Sanchez was old skool.
much as i'd like to think cycling will never have another doper someone always will.
We may have already covered this, but I can't remember and can't be bothered to search this now very lengthy thread to check ...
Do you think that a team should be able to replace a rider entered for a race but then caught doping?
I think not. It might mean collateral damage to genuinely innocent teams but it would help reinforce the anti-doping message.
Not sure about that, didn't Bardiani ride without a full team earlier this year?When does the start list become 'official'? I thought it wasn't until they turned up and signed on at the start of the race. So any team is free to make changes to their announced line-up, for any reason, right up to that point.
They had 2 riders fail dope tests iircCorrect with Bardiani, albeit they probably didn't have any other clean riders to draft in.
I vaguely remember something about a rider falling sick just before the race and they weren't allowed to replace
It makes sense to have some lead time as I can imagine there's a lot of stuff needs to be determined by the organisers pre race.
Not sure about that, didn't Bardiani ride without a full team earlier this year?