oldroadman
Veteran
- Location
- Ubique
I read the article and think that removing anyone with views which suggest "doping is OK if it's carefully controlled" is quite reasonable. We do not need people like that to encourage those who still persist with their ideas that it's OK to have chemically fuelled riders. The man's views are not "unconventional", they are plain wrong. Doubtless there are a few sports which would welcome his views, where the money is so big that they will do anything to avoid a "scandal" which might reveal their top performers are not entirely clean as they would like everyone to think.An interesting article (it's not every day you see that said about cyclingnews!) about an alternate view - which led to being sacked...
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/usa-cycling-dismisses-anti-doping-expert-over-unconventional-views/