I'm not sure of the reference 😂John Bacchus wont be happy!
Yes sure, I wasn't saying you were wrong, I just meant that the fines solved the problem quickly everywhere in Italy at first, but then differences between regions came up.There may be regional differences in compliance but nationally the number of fines is at a record high so it was wrong to conclude that as a result of the introduction of fines 👇
Let’s not go off on a tangent.If there were two cyclists it could have been a cosine.
I'm not sure of the reference 😂
As long as you wave.
If there were two cyclists it could have been a cosine.
Too late.Let’s not go off on a tangent.
Appreciated muchly 😋Someone will be along shortly to explain it to you gently.
were these friends from the north?Yes, I spoke to friends of mine in Italy. Mainly people in the North of Italy are following the rules after the fines were introduced, while people in the south of Italy are still behaving like morons and that's where most of the fines come from.
You're a bit premature - it's not yet been overturned. BTP have said they will apply to the court for the conviction to be set aside, but that will require another hearing, and you can't make the presumption that the court will agree to do so.What's so special about this thread? They dare not stop out exercise. That women from Newcastle even had her case overturned. What a joke.
I do get the reference 👍🌈 although never watched enough of the series to get into the meat of itJohn Bacchus was the police sergeant in the George Gently series (obviously set in the sixties) and he had very "of the period" views on "homos" as he termed them and non white people. Women weren't spared his views either!
I wonder what the chances are of armed army soldiers just wandering through parks & open areas, but I've with you, I don't think they want to tighten the rules, they just need to enforce them in certain areas.If you look at the bigger picture - such as what the Gov Medical Officers are saying - then I think they will only bring in more severe measures if the numbers aren't brought under control. (of course there are huge subjective judgements just in that one phrase!). I'd like to think that the threats are just crowd control (probably a good thing, even though I dislike the police state tendencies as much as the next man).
Currently? My money says no tightening. And eventually there will be a staged loosening of laws/guidance. Anyone that disagrees is welcome to show me *their* money!