It may have been pointed out before, but isn't that a trifle too fast to be riding on the pavement?I can average 20-22mph and I am not obese.
It may have been pointed out before, but isn't that a trifle too fast to be riding on the pavement?
Got that. It was a (semi)rhetorical question.They suggested 18mph not me.
by most medical standards I am obese at 18 stone and 6ft 3 . I can average 15 mph on my commute in town, I don't do running except short distance and in school over 25yrs ago I held the 100mtrs record as a "lardy" which really annoyed the racing whippetts. long distance running I hate with a passion.
Can you also average 18mph for 80 miles?
I can average 20-22mph and I am not obese. Think what more you could achieve if you lost some lbs.
That is seriously impressive; perhaps you would like to join our challenge:- http://www.cyclechat.net/threads/100-miles-in-5-hours-challenge.154680/There can be a difference between fat and heavy, although some people who would be called fat cans till get good times as just cause your fat dosent always mean your not fit for certain tasks. I average about 100 kilo which is way over my bmi and I'm classed as obese but I'm not what people would consider fat at all, I can get the bike to 30mph + from the saddle which isn't considered slow, I can average 20+ fairly easily over a flat or lumpy course
Take a cyclist of weight x kg.
Measure their average speed.
Take the same cyclist on the same bike and the same route but add 6 stone to the panniers.
Measure their average speed.
Does anyone really imagine that the second speed will be the same or higher than the first?
Take a cyclist of weight x kg.
Measure their average speed.
Take the same cyclist on the same bike and the same route but add 6 stone to the panniers.
Measure their average speed.
Does anyone really imagine that the second speed will be the same or higher than the first?