byegad
Legendary Member
- Location
- NE England
I own a QNT and a Kettwiesel. The overall length of the Kett' is about 4" longer than the QNT. Both lengths are height of rider related so taller riders will find the same difference as me in the two models.
I'm more secure on the QNT in corners, in that I can, and every so often do, lift the inside wheel in a corner. The Kettwiesel is pretty good on corners too, I have never lifted a wheel, I do take it a little bit steadier than on the QNT. I feel if it lifted the inside wheel on the Kettwiesel it would be harder to control than the QNT which is a totally instinctive correction for me. This is purely a confidence thing, I do not have good balance so others may well feel differently. Hase have some video clips of their riders on two wheels so it is certainly possible.
The Drum brakes on the QNT give much better braking than the Avid BB5s on the Kettwiesel. This is because the QNT has effectively two front brakes and the Kettwiesel two rear. It's not that the Kettwiesel brakes poorly, it stops in around the same distance as a DF, maybe a little better. The QNT brakes almost as well as my car!
I find the Kettwiesel is slower by 5 to 10% than the QNT over routes I regularly ride. Part of this is the slightly lower top gear on the Kett' which limits my habit of swooping down one hill to 'charge' the next up hill stretch. Other factors to take into acount are the more upright riding position on the Kett and the general difference in overall height. The QNT seems to 'feel' headwinds less, being so close to the road.
The Kettwiesel is a drier ride on wet days, I use the same Streamer Fairing on both trikes and the mount is relatively higher on the Kettwiesel allowing more side access to water from wind blow rain and vehicle spray but the front wheel has a mudguard and mud flap so doesn't wet me even when hitting a deep puddle. The QNT front wheels send spray sideways onto my lower thighs. Also the QNT seems to be at such a height that spray from passing vehicles hits my face more than on the Kettwiesel where I'm some 10" higher.
Parking in town favours the Kettwiesel as it can stand on its tail, so avoiding young boys 'trying out' the seat as they have been known to do with the QNT!
Riding in traffic is easier on the Kettwiesel as its height gives better vision and visibility. I use a flag on the QNT and not on the Kett' to enable drivers to 'see' me.
Both trikes are now on Big Apples and the rear suspension on the QNT really takes the sting out of bumps, the difference is noticable.
To sum up.
1. The Kettwiesel is better in the wet.
2. The QNT is a little faster.
3. In a busy town the height of the Kett' alongside its tighter turning circle makes it the first choice.
4. Off road or on bad road surfaces the QNT is a more comfortable ride.
I'm more secure on the QNT in corners, in that I can, and every so often do, lift the inside wheel in a corner. The Kettwiesel is pretty good on corners too, I have never lifted a wheel, I do take it a little bit steadier than on the QNT. I feel if it lifted the inside wheel on the Kettwiesel it would be harder to control than the QNT which is a totally instinctive correction for me. This is purely a confidence thing, I do not have good balance so others may well feel differently. Hase have some video clips of their riders on two wheels so it is certainly possible.
The Drum brakes on the QNT give much better braking than the Avid BB5s on the Kettwiesel. This is because the QNT has effectively two front brakes and the Kettwiesel two rear. It's not that the Kettwiesel brakes poorly, it stops in around the same distance as a DF, maybe a little better. The QNT brakes almost as well as my car!
I find the Kettwiesel is slower by 5 to 10% than the QNT over routes I regularly ride. Part of this is the slightly lower top gear on the Kett' which limits my habit of swooping down one hill to 'charge' the next up hill stretch. Other factors to take into acount are the more upright riding position on the Kett and the general difference in overall height. The QNT seems to 'feel' headwinds less, being so close to the road.
The Kettwiesel is a drier ride on wet days, I use the same Streamer Fairing on both trikes and the mount is relatively higher on the Kettwiesel allowing more side access to water from wind blow rain and vehicle spray but the front wheel has a mudguard and mud flap so doesn't wet me even when hitting a deep puddle. The QNT front wheels send spray sideways onto my lower thighs. Also the QNT seems to be at such a height that spray from passing vehicles hits my face more than on the Kettwiesel where I'm some 10" higher.
Parking in town favours the Kettwiesel as it can stand on its tail, so avoiding young boys 'trying out' the seat as they have been known to do with the QNT!
Riding in traffic is easier on the Kettwiesel as its height gives better vision and visibility. I use a flag on the QNT and not on the Kett' to enable drivers to 'see' me.
Both trikes are now on Big Apples and the rear suspension on the QNT really takes the sting out of bumps, the difference is noticable.
To sum up.
1. The Kettwiesel is better in the wet.
2. The QNT is a little faster.
3. In a busy town the height of the Kett' alongside its tighter turning circle makes it the first choice.
4. Off road or on bad road surfaces the QNT is a more comfortable ride.