The magistrates have committed the case to crown court which suggests they think their sentencing powers of six months are insufficient.
The offence carries a maximum of five years when dealt with at crown, and a sentence of up to two years can be suspended.
The defendant has reached 58 years of age without troubling the courts for anything, and he had a clean licence.
He has pleaded guilty at an early stage in the proceedings, which means he is entitled to the maximum credit available for doing so.
Like it or not, as a general rule we don't lock up people of previous good character for a first offence where there is an alternative.
The offence does not appear to be the worst of its type, it was genuinely a momentary lack of attention, there being no suggestion his driving was anything other than careful up to that point.
Where is all this leading?
I reckon about a year or 15 months, which his barrister will be hopeful of getting suspended.
That's what I think will happen, what I think ought to happen may be slightly different.