colcazal said:Hi,
Firstly may I say that as a newcomer to the cycling world I have found this site and the people on it to be very friendly and helpful to say the least. Thanks!!
However, In my quest for a bike I have been looking at many cycling forums in the UK and USA. Like everyone, I had a budget to adhere to when choosing a bike. I have found a degree of snobbery within OTHER forums with regards to bike choice, people seem to look down there noses at entry level bikes and would'nt recommend a bike under £800.
All I have to say is that if people want to spend £250 or £2500 thats up to them. We all choose bikes for different reasons. My reason is to stay fit and just cycle. I am not going to suddendly turn into a pro rider even if I spend £2500 or more so whats the point.
If there is anyone out there who looks down at people because they have 'nt got the best groupset or whatever, please just think why! Why do you need a expensive bike. Is it because you need it to compete at a pro or amateur level or have you bought it for the name? Whatever the answer is, it's up to them!
Just a thought!
Col
alecstilleyedye said:it'll be interesting to see how the bloke, who occasionally commutes to work on a mountain bike, gets on on the spesh full carbon machine he came into work today. i could absolutely toast him on the mountain bike, even on my old steel racer, so it'll be interesting to see how much better that me he is (or isn't) with us both on our best bikes (his better than mine).
colcazal said:Get blanked cause you wear a hi-vis? Whats the world coming to!
I wear a hi-vis all the time. I want to do the most to get seen. After all cycling is great but seeing my wee boys when I get home is much better!
Col
Admin said:Well I've got a two grand carbon road bike, and fifty pence jumble sale lungs.
This means I look good for about the 10 seconds it takes anyone with half decent fitness to pass me. (Including MTB's with wonky back wheels, and even wonkier riders!) :?:
Having said that, there is a marked difference between my posh bike and my commuter. I can happily spend hours and hours in the saddle of my posh bike and feel good at the end of the ride. It's far less comfortable on the commuter, and as such I usually take the posh bike if I can.
I don't mind being passed by other riders; it doesn't effect my enjoyment of my bike, and doesn't make me want to hunt them down and pass them.
Both bikes have masses of potential, just a shame the rider doesn't do them justice. I generally bimble along, and that suits either of my bikes; it's just that the posh one is nicer to bimble along on.
If it works for you, it doesn't matter what it cost!!
Cheers,
Shaun
simonali said:I'm saving up for one of these so I can look down me nose at the bloody lot of ya!
Twenty Inch said:I already look down on anyone who has fewer than 6 bikes.
laurence said:*tut tut*
you'll have to go better than that to look down your nose at me.
if you want snobbery, then pootle along on a really nice bike, talk to the birds and animals you pass, pause to admire the view, wear baggy shorts over your lycra and say hello to old people as you pass them (or they pass you). see how ignored you can be by the super fast roadies and the extreme MTBers.
then again. if that's how you ride you're not in for the same reasons as them, so it won't matter.
Abitrary said:I think a lot of snobbery in cycling stems from the fact that cycling is generally viewed as a plebby, utilitarian form of transport, by non-cyclists.
Kit and bike snobbery by enthusiasts can maybe viewed as an attempt to distance themselves from this... a way of saying "my other bike's a porsche".