Cycle computers for a newbie

[Browser]

I'm toying with the idea of getting a cycle computer, as I have noticed lots of references on here to speeds (peak, average etc) and it's got me wondering what my maximums/minimums are (it's all you lot's ruddy fault, I was perfectly happy not knowing 'til I registered here!). Does anyone have a recommendation for an entry level model? Will I be better off with wireless or wired? Will knowi9ng how fast I am (not) going make me any happier?
p.s. numb question, but are most of them backlit as I assume this is pretty vital?

 

[jig-sore]

the halfords 8 function computer is nothing special but good for a beginner.

it's only just over £10 so won't dent your wallet too much

PS: nobody mention cyclogs

 

[BikeShapedObject]

I agree, the Halfords 8 function is very good.

Don't get a wireless, they're shoot.

 

[SimonRoberts0204]

I agree, the Halfords 8 function is very good.

Don't get a wireless, they're shoot.

Are they? In what sense? - Dont tell me i'm going faster than my Sigma wireless tells me I am! (OK - you can if you like )

 

[BikeShapedObject]

Are they? In what sense? - Dont tell me i'm going faster than my Sigma wireless tells me I am! (OK - you can if you like )

They're fine, if you don't mind them occasionally deciding your maximum speed was 78 mph, after a brief bit of RF or atmospheric interference from various sources!

 

[scots_lass]

I cycle mainly in the countryside so I don't get any interference on my wireless (but I look forward to the day when my max. speed is 78mph or higher!). I just have a bog standard cheapo one which does as it says on the tin.

 

[snorri]

Wireless ones are great, no wires.
City dwellers do report problems with wireless due to interference from traffic control equipment, lights etc. but my Cateye wireless has never missed a beat in 20,000 miles. Except for once in a city when I exceeded 99 mph when stationary, but the trip mileage reading was unaffected.
Some might say the advantage of no wires is outweighed by the disadvantage of requiring two batteries.
If you are interested in average speeds, it is worth checking before you buy to see if the timer stops counting at each break in your journey, eg traffic lights or cafe breaks, or if the timer runs continuously from the start to the end of your journey.

 

[BikeShapedObject]

Aye, my problems with the Raleigh wireless were in the city..... every time I used it. I have the halfords 8 function now, and it's perfect for my needs.... nd as you say, only one battery. And the timer stops when the bike does......

 

[pauljonhaz]

I agree wired computers are better I only have a cheapy but does the job. Wireless are a pain in the backside, as mentioned can give inaccurate reading but also can keep going even when you take them out of their holder.

My mates VDO still gives him readings while his computer is in his pocket and wheeling his bike into the office so messes exact times and average speed etc unless you take note before wheeling your bike to your shed or wherever!

 

[Muddyfox]

My mates VDO still gives him readings while his computer is in his pocket and wheeling his bike into the office so messes exact times and average speed etc unless you take note before wheeling your bike to your shed or wherever!

Or he could just switch it off before he puts it in his pocket ?

Simon

 

[pauljonhaz]

Or he could just switch it off before he puts it in his pocket ?

Simon

I'll have to let him know

 

[BikeShapedObject]

On the other hand, you could do no wrong with a CYCLE PIANO instead. NO BATTERIES REQUIRED.

 

[Sam Kennedy]

THAT IS FREAKING AWESOME!

I might try and make myself a cycle guitar

 

[BikeShapedObject]

THAT IS FREAKING AWESOME!

I might try and make myself a cycle guitar

I recommend a BMX BANJO. Easier to carry... or perhaps a HYBRID HARP, even.

NURSE........!

 

[Browser]

Thanks for the replies, looks like halfrauds might be getting a visit from me (oh how they'll look forward to that!)