As i have already said, i am not interested in individual cases....
All I want to know is, in a million bicycle accidents, how many were wearing helmets and is there any difference in the proportion of fatalities in either group?
If someone can show me genuine figures that prove 'on average' a cyclist involved in an accident is less likely to suffer life changing or terminal head injuries if wearing a helmet then I'm in, no further questions. I am very surprised that this data is not available already. It is almost stupidly obvious that if you protect your head you will receive less severe injuries, my gut feeling tells me this is true, but my head thinks more deeply than my gut and questions the fact that there is nothing more substantial than 'it's obvious innit?' to support this!
In the vein as the
@steveindenmark comment, my experience of being involved in a serious rta that left me with a broken neck and fractured skull is that I walked away from the accident (until the paramedics caught up with me and strapped me to a spine board
) and appear to be on the road to a full physical recovery. There has also been no long term harm to my amazing good looks after the initial bruising scabs cleared up. The closest a surgeon or doctor ever got to me was purely examination so i would have to surmise that the compelling result of my experiment is that a helmet is totally uneccessary?