Thought I'd chip in to this as I have a vested interest. What with me being the editor of Cycling Plus and all. I've just looked back over the last issue and found the offending caption and hands up, I missed it. That said, I'm no engineer so I'm going to consult one to check if this is, indeed, BS. (Yes, it's a bit late now but...)
But a couple of points: Mickle "Cycling Pus is and always has been full of shoot, and don't get me started on that Paul Vincent character." You're perfectly entitled to your opinion about the magazine, and I'm perfectly entitled to disagree but for future accuracy Paul left Cycling Plus some time ago.
And Smokin Joe. Likewise we're all entitled to an opinion but I definitely don't agree with: "As 90% of modern cycling journalists are clueless self-gratification artists who swallow any old shoot fed to them by marketing men they write exactly what the manufacturers intend them to write, ie crap that is designed to make the readers think they must have a different bike for evey day of the week" They're not and they don't.
Rob