Current Affairs Folder posting only, no replies.

[Mugshot]

much prefer the diy, gardening and sports threads these days.....

Just as well.

 

[jowwy]

Just as well.

yup - less abuse in those threads....can just enjoy peoples hard work and endeavour, but then again i was called a willy waver for posting in the too....go figure

 

[jowwy]

So they have even had their own thread closed and deleted, what does that say……..

 

[Mugshot]

So they have even had their own thread closed and deleted, what does that say……..

anyway enjoy your last few days in naca. I wont be replying anymore

You still here?

 

[jowwy]

You still here?

Of course….why would i leave, been on CC for many many years

 

[Mugshot]

Of course….why would i leave, been on CC for many many years

You said you weren't going to post in this thread any more.

 

[jowwy]

You said you weren't going to post in this thread any more.

No i didnt…..i said i wasn’t replying to the other poster anymore, slight difference

 

[Mugshot]

No i didnt…..i said i wasn’t replying to the other poster anymore, slight difference

Ah, my apologies, as you were

 

[lazybloke]

do you know why he was banned, was he banned for breaking rules?? was he banned because certain elements of CC shouted down his opinions and had him reported for holding such views?? did his opinions not meet with like minded others and therefore reported for not having the same views???

could be many reasons for a ban

People don't get moderated/banned for holding a contrary viewpoint; discussion of different views is the entire point of the forum.

They get moderated/banned for aggression, insults and lies; sometimes for hate-speech. Maybe even exposing the site to potential legal action.

 

[winjim]

So they have even had their own thread closed and deleted, what does that say……..

Power from the sky, from the tower shots rang out.

 

[jowwy]

People don't get moderated/banned for holding a contrary viewpoint; discussion of different views is the entire point of the forum.

They get moderated/banned for aggression, insults and lies; sometimes for hate-speech. Maybe even exposing the site to potential legal action.

Didnt get banned for any of those things……but no need to discuss it here, it was well over 18mths ago

 

[lazybloke]

Didnt get banned for any of those things……but no need to discuss it here, it was well over 18mths ago

I maintain that differing viewpoints are not the reason for a ban, it's the way that viewpoints are expressed.

 

[jowwy]

I maintain that differing viewpoints are not the reason for a ban, it's the way that viewpoints are expressed.

As i already stated i got banned for none of those things….and i wont be discussing it, so give it a rest.

This is one of the reasons naca has been shut. People just cant accept someones answer and move on, they have dig and dig and dig, until the poster snaps……just accept what some one says and move on.

 

[lazybloke]

As i already stated i got banned for none of those things….and i wont be discussing it, so give it a rest.

This is one of the reasons naca has been shut. People just cant accept someones answer and move on, they have dig and dig and dig, until the poster snaps……just accept what some one says and move on.

It's because you've misunderstood if you think I'm digging and digging and digging at you.

I was contributing to a discussion between you and @roubaixtuesday about an unnamed person being banned .
Not knowing who that person was, I used generic phrasing when I gave 5 examples of objectional content that might result in moderation/banning. If you disagree with my words, take a look at the rules which give at least 10 such examples.

NB I've said nothing here today about the nature of your content, or why you may have been subject to past moderation or bans; no need to feel I'm getting at you; no need to "snap".j

 

[jowwy]

It's because you've misunderstood if you think I'm digging and digging and digging at you.

I was contributing to a discussion between you and @roubaixtuesday about an unnamed person being banned .
Not knowing who that person was, I used generic phrasing when I gave 5 examples of objectional content that might result in moderation/banning. If you disagree with my words, take a look at the rules which give at least 10 such examples.

NB I've said nothing here today about the nature of your content, or why you may have been subject to past moderation or bans; no need to feel I'm getting at you; no need to "snap".j

Im not snapping…..im just making it clear i wasnt banned for any of the reasons you state, end of.

enjoy your day.