Blofeld is there largely to commentate on what he sees.......
He doesn't know what he sees, which is why we hear about the number 19 bus.......
Blofeld is there largely to commentate on what he sees.......
To someone who loves but doesn't really understand the game (which I suspect is a large chunk of the audience) Blofeld in his day was a good commentator, because he could make it colourful. He should have been pensioned off years ago, though. Many of the current crop of commentators are just grey - and the main exception is Boycott, who has one topic of discussion. Himself.He doesn't know what he sees, which is why we hear about the number 19 bus.......
"I'll have the blandest thing on the menu!" I wonder if they make any more concession to non-European tastes when India are playing.
Blofeld is there largely to commentate on what he sees, whereas Boycott is there as an expert summariser.
He caught one!!!No such thing as a easy slip catch, I've shelled more than a few in my time.
........ I know who's opinion I trust just now.
.......I wouldn't want to be a batsman facing the new ball out there this morning.
Mine?
Not doable, however much they apply themselves. Not on the 5th day of a Test, at Headingley, and with it turning prodigiously.