https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.30.20142570v1Equivalent reports from the Pfizer phase I data.
Reactions were worse at the second jab (for the same dose). Summarised as "Local reactions and systemic events were dose-dependent, generally mild to moderate, and transient. " so certainly not seen as massively unusual.
View attachment 557511
Yes sorry, the confusion is my fault for bringing up the Oxford study.
My employer always has in the past. We were told it couldn't be offered this year as there weren't enough available nationallyI would have it, but I am under 50 so am not in the initial list.
I wonder if employers will offer it to their staff, mine does free flu jabs every year so maybe?
Surely if one doesn't mix with the plebs then one has no need of a vaccination? 😄After the Royal Family, House of Lords, cabinet and senior civil service it will be a case of sharpest elbows first.
It really isn't. It needs mass uptake to be effective, so I'd cheerfully make it mandatory. And I'll happily be jabbed when the time comes - it's as important a part of being a member of society as paying taxes or getting educated.
If the vaccine still let's you have the virus in you, but not make you ill from it, would it still be possible to transmit it to someone else?
I would have it, but I am under 50 so am not in the initial list.
I don't really understand why people wouldn't want the Covid vaccine - it's your civic duty to protect your fellow citizens.
Ding Ding Ding, Nobody knows anything yet about this miracle vaccine, there's an old saying which says if it's seems to be too good to be true, it probably is.Nobody knows yet