fossyant
Ride It Like You Stole It!
- Location
- South Manchester
Direct from the NHS website:-
So you would prioritise fit younger age groups rather than vulnerable slightly older groups? Just to clarify, a clinically vulnerable 25 year old severe asthmatic in Bristol would fall behind fit and healthy 20 year olds in Bolton?They still need to prioritise. Hotspot areas would be my priority.
I'll be expecting a call bringing my appointment forward then?
In an attempt to prevent spread to areas where rates are currently very low.So you would prioritise fit younger age groups rather than vulnerable slightly older groups? Just to clarify, a clinically vulnerable 25 year old severe asthmatic in Bristol would fall behind fit and healthy 20 year olds in Bolton?
First jab doesn't do a whole lot to reduce transmission, that effect kicks in two weeks after second jab is how I read it. So not a lot of point in vaccinating Indian variant hot spots as that's a 12 week or so lead in. I would expect the best way at the moment is test, trace, isolate plus all the usual distancing etc. Should cut down on serious illness and hospitalisation though.
Largely unworkable I suspect. When they had a vaccine shortage here they were supposed to re schedule but didn't happend for me and others I saw. Plus where do you start - people with an appointment in a week, two weeks by which time you are only bringing very few forward because most over 50s will have had them . Probably would have been a better idea to have tried harder to stop the variant getting here - they were warned.Apparently they are going to reduce the time between doses for over 50s from 12 weeks to 8 weeks.
Are they going to reschedule all the appointments already made or is it just another unworkable Boris platitude.
OK. So 8 week schedule only for those who don't already have their 2nd jab appointment. Mine - booked a while back - is for 11 weeks and 6 days after my first.
It would seem more sensible to me to prioritise younger people's first dose in hotspot areas.
In an attempt to prevent spread to areas where rates are currently very low.
Conjecture on your part.Then when the 25 year old Bristolian asthmatic who had their second dose cancelled dies you can come on here and announce that Boris is sacrificing the vulnerable, and no-one knows what they are doing
I just did.although you can't actually tell us what.
It’s policy I am questioning, not the efforts of teams on the ground.working their f**king arses off 7 days a week.
So you would prioritise less vulnerable groups, for the sake of more vulnerable groups? Then when the 25 year old Bristolian asthmatic who had their second dose cancelled dies you can come on here and announce that Boris is sacrificing the vulnerable, and no-one knows what they are doing
The system is doing its absolute best right now, it is a shame that you can't feel the pressure it is under from all angles..........
From the media, did you hear some of the press conference questions yesterday? Seriously, idiots.
From patient groups, it's not fair that my xxx can't have the jab, they have xxx disease, it's a scandal.
From people who are 35 because 36 year olds are getting it, and trust me, that has happened in every age group change all the way down from 50.
From anti-vaxxers, I know of a nurse being threatened with rape while she was alone in a car park because she was carrying out a genocide on people by injecting poison in to minority groups, after a 9 hour shift in a vaccination centre.
From people like yourself who handily point out that whatever the change made, you would have done something different and better, although you can't actually tell us what.
From people who just plain lie about themselves to get/not get the vaccine.
From more besides this lot.
One day, people working in the system will get to say what it was like dealing with this. It's not pretty at times, and everyone is just trying their absolute best, in a situation where not all the facts are known (and indeed fundamentally change on a terrifyingly regular basis) to deal with injecting 60 to 70 million people in a few months in places that were not designed to ever host a health intervention.
One day everyone will look back and realise this was actually a minor f**king miracle that any of this happened, from the very top to the very bottom, and they will look back and be bloody grateful for the effort that has been put in to it by a surprisingly small group of people who are working their f**king arses off 7 days a week.
Well, not really, you are criticising already, no reason to think you wouldn't criticise in the future.Conjecture on your part
Oh is this your policy you just told us about?I just did
What ages? What risk factors? Which ethnic group? Where would you vaccinate them? What is the time frame? How long before you start? Would you allow them to socialise in the meantime? How would you gain consent for some? Come on, you need to sort your policy and offering, not just say younger people in hotspot areas. If you are 80, then 35 years olds are younger, if you are 35, 18 is younger, if you are 18, 10 is younger.......It would seem more sensible to me to prioritise younger people's first dose in hotspot areas
Surely you can see that the teams on the ground are implementing the policy, so the criticism is of the teams on the ground?It’s policy I am questioning, not the efforts of teams on the ground
No, you are right Craig. One should accept every policy decision made by the government without question. One should never be questioning whether a policy decision is made because it is the most effective thing to do rather than because it is easier or politically expedient.Well, not really, you are criticising already, no reason to think you wouldn't criticise in the future.
Everyone doing thier best then people right at the top undermining the whole thing by letting variants in despite ample warning.