Corona Virus: How Are We Doing?

You have the virus

  • Yes

    Votes: 57 21.2%
  • I've been quaranteened

    Votes: 19 7.1%
  • I personally know someone who has been diagnosed

    Votes: 71 26.4%
  • Clear as far as I know

    Votes: 150 55.8%

  • Total voters
    269
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
If you can't be arsed then I guess you're not too bothered about finding answers to your questions. :smile:

You obviously don't know either.

I don't believe it's illegal to go to work with Covid, if it was the Government instructed us to break the law.

As useless as they may seem I doubt they would do that.
 
Whether it's legal or not it's certainly not something that should be done as you will be exposing all other passengers and the driver to it. It's hardly surprising bus services across the country are being cancelled daily due to the lack of available drivers with no doubt many off work with covid.

Being legal or not is the debate here, nothing else.

Apparently people call for debate on here and seek alternative opinions backed up with evidence?

I don't think it's illegal to go to work having tested positive for Covid, the Government seems to agree?
 

Ajax Bay

Guru
Location
East Devon
@classic33 I asked if you could share a link to the legal restrictions to the actions of a person with a notifiable disease.
You shared a link to this (quoting the abstract): "Section 33 of The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 makes it an offence for a person in England and Wales who is suffering from a notifiable disease, e.g. cholera, to use any bus, tram or train; or use a taxi without notifying the driver or owner of the vehicle . . .
"A literature review using PubMed did not reveal any evidence that buses, trains, trams or taxis provide a significant vehicle for transmission of notifiable diseases. Is it therefore about time that a non-evidence-based and little-used law is removed from the British statute books?"
So the restriction is that a person who knows or thinks they are so infected is required by law to tell the bus (or train (how would that work?)) driver they were or may be a carrier.
Don't get me wrong: if I think (testing or not) I've got a transmissible disease which might cause serious illness (last time for me was COVID-19 in July), I will not use public transport and will minimise any contact with others. I'm trying to tease out the legal implications for an individual who thinks or is so infected with SARS-CoV-19 virus with COVID-19 (still) being a notifiable disease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

classic33

Leg End Member
@classic33 I asked if you could share a link to the legal restrictions to the actions of a person with a notifiable disease.
You shared a link to this (quoting the abstract): "Section 33 of The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 makes it an offence for a person in England and Wales who is suffering from a notifiable disease, e.g. cholera, to use any bus, tram or train; or use a taxi without notifying the driver or owner of the vehicle . . .
"A literature review using PubMed did not reveal any evidence that buses, trains, trams or taxis provide a significant vehicle for transmission of notifiable diseases. Is it therefore about time that a non-evidence-based and little-used law is removed from the British statute books?"
So the restriction is that a person who knows or thinks they are so infected is required by law to tell the bus (or train (how would that work?)) driver they were or may be a carrier.
Don't get me wrong: if I think (testing or not) I've got a transmissible disease which might cause serious illness (last time for me was COVID-19 in July), I will not use public transport and will minimise any contact with others. I'm trying to tease out the legal implications for an individual who thinks or is so infected with SARS-CoV-19 virus with COVID-19 (still) being a notifiable disease.
They, the infected person, can be turned off the service. With no recourse to recover any monies lost as a result of their actions.
 

Ajax Bay

Guru
Location
East Devon
Any problems with your thums?
ETA: The Moderna bivalent was approved by MHRA for adult booster doses on 15 Aug and they followed that with approval for the Pfizer version on 3 Sep. Around the country the Moderna Spikevax has been more available (pre-ordering and earlier approval) but the Pfizer is now rolling out (and @Ming is a beneficiary). They both have the same 'mode': a 50/50 mix of targetting the original virus 2020 strain and Omicron (seriousness of illness). Any effect on transmissibility is ~~~~
The Pfizer bivalent is the recommended booster vaccine for U/18s (the Moderna bivalent is not licensed for U/18s).
 
Last edited:

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
Top Bottom