Flying_Monkey
Recyclist
- Location
- Odawa
The UCI have just copped out. Long term, whatever there motivation they have made a poor decision for cycling and sport,
Didn't you know that the 'C' in UCI stood for 'Cop-out'?
The UCI have just copped out. Long term, whatever there motivation they have made a poor decision for cycling and sport,
The UCI have just copped out.
There was a story on the Scottish News tonight about a Hamilton Accies player who was banned for 4 weeks after failing a drug test...he had taken a diet supplement which stated on the label "contains no banned substances" and had asked the club doctor to check as well...although a short ban he was still held responsible in the ruling for anything in his body.
In fairness, they haven't. Not yet anyway. It wasn't their decision, it was the Spanish federation. What's more that decision was made within the rules... whatever we as individuals may think of it.
I have a gut feel that UCI won't appeal the decision to CAS. THAT is something you could consider a cop out.
I admit that I interpret the rules to support my way of thinking! I want the cheating git to be punished.
I think the test, having just researched a bit, is still waiting so that's a non-starter at the moment.
Okay, as you were Bertie, carry on.
I want contador to get off with it, just so that I can run up the alpe d'huez next to him dressed as a steak.
I want contador to get off with it, just so that I can run up the alpe d'huez next to him dressed as a steak.
Is that a promise?
Depends on how much time I have between knowing whether he is riding it, and the start of the race, but I am serious about this