SkipdiverJohn
Deplorable Brexiteer
- Location
- London
I've been tinkering around with a pair of £5 shabby 3-speeds, with a view to possibly using the best bits of both to create a low-maintenance hub gear local knockabout as I have a liking for SA 3-speeds. Yes, I've already got a 3 speed Puch Elegance, but that is pretty tidy as I've owned it from new. The scruffy donor pair are a '88 dated Halfords own (NOT Apollo oddly) and a '73/74 vintage Puch Touring. The PO got the Halfords S/H and it's previous usage is unknown. The Puch is a one-owner bike, only used for less than two years and been stored in a shed for the last 43 years. You'd therefore expect the Puch to be near mint and the Halfords to be rusty (which it is) - but the Puch is far, far worse, with much of the chrome gone from the bars and rear wheel including the Styria hub gear. The mattress saddle is OK, which suggests the shed didn't leak and the bars & seatpost both moved freely.
I suppose the question is, is 1970's Puch chrome of exceptionally poor quality? Both it and the Halfords would have been budget bikes, and noticeably cheaper to buy than the equivalent Raleigh, yet the Halfords has survived much better despite probably having had more use. Maybe someone like @midlife with some inside knowledge might care to comment on whether poor chrome durability was endemic in certain brands even when they were new? I'm just surprised how something stored under cover has managed to get so rusty!
I suppose the question is, is 1970's Puch chrome of exceptionally poor quality? Both it and the Halfords would have been budget bikes, and noticeably cheaper to buy than the equivalent Raleigh, yet the Halfords has survived much better despite probably having had more use. Maybe someone like @midlife with some inside knowledge might care to comment on whether poor chrome durability was endemic in certain brands even when they were new? I'm just surprised how something stored under cover has managed to get so rusty!
Last edited: