GrumpyGregry
Here for rides.
I'll expand. The only way to guarantee to avoid the tragic consequences of the so-called "unlucky punch" is not to throw it in the first place.
I researched those a while ago. The conditions under which they fit are quite strict.It seems crazy that any bike manufacture could make & sell track framesets that were not drilled for a front brake. Even if the intention is initially just for the track, I can't imagine many scenarios where track bikes don't end up being sold off and used on the road when they come to the end of their track life.
As I ride TT's mostly on fixed, I have been looking for an aero track frameset with a front brake drilling for a long time, but they just don't seem to exist.
But, my google friend has just spotted this dia compe brake for a non drilled fork:-
http://www.velodromeshop.net/track-bike-brakesets/dia-compe-track-bike-front-brake/
Has anybody used one?
It could open up my options for frames in my price range.
Thanks, sounds as if a replacement TT fork would be the best option, but it just pushes a £399 planet x frameset into a higher cost bracket and not one I can justify for about a dozen 10 mile TT's each year.I researched those a while ago. The conditions under which they fit are quite strict.
http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/categ...roduct/review-dia-compe-track-brake-10-39409/
No, one front brake. Have a Nelson track frame which can take a brake, but it's not particularly aero.You are riding road 10 mile TT's on a bike without a front brake?
I find this very hard to believe. I reckon I have seen fewer than 10 fixed wheel bikes, without any second brake, in about the same number of years that I have been working in central London.
I hope you will all, like me, write to your MP pointing out that it's high time the law was changed to address the fact that each year around 400 pedestrians are killed by cars, and 5000 seriously injured.
You really think it won't be anti cycling? Come on, the whole thing is driven by the right wing press, taunts such as Adam Bolton, and the Briggs anti cycling campaign. Jesse Norman's job will be to appease them by restricting cycling.I heard Jesse Norman this morning and thought that he was very balanced saying this was only part of a review that was would also have a remit to look at the safety of cyclists and he pointed out the number of cyclists killed and injured in comparison to peds injured by cyclists.
The BBC headlines make this sound anti-cyclist though.
The whole thing is a knee-jerk reaction to a typical UK moral-panic about a non-issue that has ignorant nobbers foaming at the mouth on social media.You really think it won't be anti cycling? Come on, the whole thing is driven by the right wing press, taunts such as Adam Bolton, and the Briggs anti cycling campaign. Jesse Norman's job will be to appease them by restricting cycling.
You don't seriously expect a grieving widower to indulge in your sort of victim blaming so you?I see her widower is continuing his anti cyclist campaign this morning. I wonder if he'll be acknowledging the responsibilities of pedestrians to look what's coming before stepping out in front of traffic.