Pale Rider
Legendary Member
He's in court because the pedestrian died after a collision with a cyclist. Cyclist are a menace. Especially Lahndahn Louts.
Had he been driving a car as badly, and as badly "maintained" well... the defence have said it all, a much lesser charge I reckon.
Were he a driver, he would have been in line for one of the causing death by driving charges.
They don't apply to cyclists because of the wording '...you drove a mechanically propelled vehicle...' which is why the prosecution has got a bit creative with the wanton and furious/manslaughter charging approach.