Cav has proved time and again that he can win without a "train"That said, it would be more interesting if he tries to develop as a rider rather than sticking to bagging sprint-train led flat stage wins.
Cav has proved time and again that he can win without a "train"That said, it would be more interesting if he tries to develop as a rider rather than sticking to bagging sprint-train led flat stage wins.
Wasn't the chat a while back that AS would go back to Saxo and Bertie to Movistar maybe.I don't think that means all three are going to Leaky, but just that they're in talks.
It's difficult to see who might take the Schlecks on really, with Frank's drug bust still being judged and Andy's strange non-season.
Cav has proved time and again that he can win without a "train"
Well it didn't this year, or at least, Brailsford decided that it wouldn't. Apart from Bernie Eisel, who rarely leaves Cav's side, and the last two stages when yellow was definitely in the bag, Cav was more or less left to his own devices for three weeks.If a team has 9 riders in a tour could they not have 4 riders protecting Wiggins or Froome and 3 for Cav or would that not work?
might BMC come up with the dosh? They have a higher wage bill than Sky4) No-one else is going to offer the kind of money he's on right now, so he would have to take a paycut (not that I think money is a huge motivator right now for him).
....
might BMC come up with the dosh? They have a higher wage bill than Sky
as far as I can make out, only the first five stages of the 2013 TdF have been settled. Now............the 2012 TdF suited Wiggins. The 2013 TdF may not. There's no sentiment in Sky, and Dave Brailsford will look at the course and choose the best prospect for yellow. If it's vertiginous that will surely mean Froome - presuming he does well in the Vuelta and is in good shape next June. And, if it's Froome surely the requirement for lung-busting five or six man long distance sessions at the front for the climbing stages will be less critical. Would Sky then be in a position to go for green and yellow?
The other big consideration is Sagan. Hushovd beat Cav to green because he was better in the 'general' stages. Sagan would appear (to me, if nobody else) to have the same advantage. But..........Cavendish still won three stages and took his total to an extraordinary 23 stages (I have to think twice as I type that). To put that in to context, Cipo and Zabel only won twelve each - he's nigh on equalling their combined record! History beckons. He might think that overtaking Leduq and Hinault means more than another green jersey. He's only 27 years old, and must fancy his chances. Perhaps he thinks that if he can stick at it long enough he might overhaul Merckx! If stage wins are the priority, where better to be than Sky?
I take your point - but the sheer technical and organisational brilliance of Sky makes them the ideal team to work with. But.yes, if he could fashion a deal with another team, bring Bernie with him, bring some of Sky's innovations across........
how about evbh thomas stannard for Cav and froome porte knees rogers for wigginsWell it didn't this year, or at least, Brailsford decided that it wouldn't. Apart from Bernie Eisel, who rarely leaves Cav's side, and the last two stages when yellow was definitely in the bag, Cav was more or less left to his own devices for three weeks.
I think Sky threw absolutely everything at the GC this year, with nothing left to chance. They might relax a bit in future, now they know how to do it.Well it didn't this year, or at least, Brailsford decided that it wouldn't. Apart from Bernie Eisel, who rarely leaves Cav's side, and the last two stages when yellow was definitely in the bag, Cav was more or less left to his own devices for three weeks.