OneCogDown
Active Member
Thanks for the replies, as I had hoped some useful comments on both bike and rider, sorry if my post was too long.
I wish I could explore wider tyres but the 28 mm tyres are about as wide as the chainstays allow there is less than 2 mm clearance at present. I've played with pressures down to 65psi and it made a slight difference to the harshness but made it even harder to maintain my normal pace.
CougieUK my post was perhaps unclear, it is only the steel tourer that I am finding fatiguing not the other bike which simply is to big but does seem more "springy" and less jarring.
Alex321 & Mustang1 are I think confirming, a steel frame does not guarantee a smooth or compliant ride. I'm quite sure when braking hard on my old Dawes i could see some deflection on the forks or just locking the brakes and leaning on the bars caused some flex, this Columbus fork seems rigid despite a normal looking rake.
Maybe I need to go and test another steel bike but with 531 or similar tubing along with a carbon framed bike to compare. Never ridden a carbon frame so perhaps its time.
Presta, thanks for being so frank.
Up to 2018 commuted 2x25km weekly
2018 - 2019 30-50 +30km weekly
2019 - Sept 2019 30-50km x2 weekly
Sept 2019-Oct 2020 30-50km x 3 weekly
April 2021-Nov 2021 50-80km+30kmx2 weekly
I wound the distance up quite slowly and apart from on hills am generally in HR zone 2&3. When I felt the need to back off or rest I did and I seemed fine until riding the 200 on this bike, since then as posted do feel I'm struggling, when before I was'nt.
Ming, just seen your post, I have tried a set of tubeless Fulcrum 5s but no difference other than punctures.
I wish I could explore wider tyres but the 28 mm tyres are about as wide as the chainstays allow there is less than 2 mm clearance at present. I've played with pressures down to 65psi and it made a slight difference to the harshness but made it even harder to maintain my normal pace.
CougieUK my post was perhaps unclear, it is only the steel tourer that I am finding fatiguing not the other bike which simply is to big but does seem more "springy" and less jarring.
Alex321 & Mustang1 are I think confirming, a steel frame does not guarantee a smooth or compliant ride. I'm quite sure when braking hard on my old Dawes i could see some deflection on the forks or just locking the brakes and leaning on the bars caused some flex, this Columbus fork seems rigid despite a normal looking rake.
Maybe I need to go and test another steel bike but with 531 or similar tubing along with a carbon framed bike to compare. Never ridden a carbon frame so perhaps its time.
Presta, thanks for being so frank.
Up to 2018 commuted 2x25km weekly
2018 - 2019 30-50 +30km weekly
2019 - Sept 2019 30-50km x2 weekly
Sept 2019-Oct 2020 30-50km x 3 weekly
April 2021-Nov 2021 50-80km+30kmx2 weekly
I wound the distance up quite slowly and apart from on hills am generally in HR zone 2&3. When I felt the need to back off or rest I did and I seemed fine until riding the 200 on this bike, since then as posted do feel I'm struggling, when before I was'nt.
Ming, just seen your post, I have tried a set of tubeless Fulcrum 5s but no difference other than punctures.
Last edited: