Camera Tripods

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Mad Doug Biker

Just a damaged guy.
Location
Craggy Island
Those look reasonable actually, although I get the impression mine will still be standing after a nuclear apocolypse! :biggrin:
 

Melvil

Guest
Another vote for the Manfrotto 190XB - great tripod and like the others I've abused it to hell (mainly during seaside shoots where it gets lots of salt water corrosion, dropping on rocks, bashed about generally) and it's lasted. The central column being able to rise up and also invert is very handy indeed and there's very little jitter. Very happy with it.

I've also got the Joby Gorillapod SLR zoom and I'm not very happy to be honest. It's a pain to adjust and also not very stable, it seems very jittery and since I like to take 30 second+ exposures, the picture quality comes out cack. It's good if you're in a pinch and don't want the extra weight of the manfrotto (like the last time I was in London) but still not great.

Mel.
 
+1 For manfrotto. About 15 years ago I went from a £30 tripod to a £120 one of these and it was like manner from heaven in comparison - a joy. Too much and too heavy to take walking 90% of the time. Imagine there are some sturdy enough between that price range. Can recommend the monpod of theirs I got too.
 

Fiona N

Veteran
I got a lightweight tripod back in the '80s to take with an OM1 to the Antarctic and it's done a great job ever since including years of off-road (bicycle) touring. I guess lightweight back in the '80s was still pretty heavy and robust compared to more modern incarnations. Nowadays my main grumble is that it's not tall enough for using for a long period e.g. a fireworks display - great for the first 10 mins then my back starts to complain.
 
OP
OP
dellzeqq

dellzeqq

pre-talced and mighty
Location
SW2
I got a lightweight tripod back in the '80s to take with an OM1 to the Antarctic and it's done a great job ever since including years of off-road (bicycle) touring. I guess lightweight back in the '80s was still pretty heavy and robust compared to more modern incarnations. Nowadays my main grumble is that it's not tall enough for using for a long period e.g. a fireworks display - great for the first 10 mins then my back starts to complain.
that is points. Lots of points!!!!

http://www.johnlewis.com/230485705/Product.aspx - any thoughts?
 
Location
Herts
My Velbon (believe it was an AE2?) that I bought in 1973 died recently when the pad behind the snap leg clamp became a ping****it. Spoke with Velbon but couldn't find a similar product. Now have a Manfrotto 055XPROB bought as exdemo for just under £80 and added a Vanguard b&s head. Very pleased and hope it lasts as long as the Velbon.
 

Mad Doug Biker

Just a damaged guy.
Location
Craggy Island

It look reasonable enough (I thought the head looks a bit cheap, but what do I know? I'm used to Manfrotto and not much else. It just looks cheap to me, that's all).

One thing I'd say against it though is that you will only be able to open the legs so far, therefore hampering versatility (but then, the uber flexibility of mine isn't to everyone's taste).
 
Ah well, if you really want to be 100% sure of holding your camera steady, and have a cool £12,000+ at your ready disposal: :biggrin:

dh1851150.jpg

http://www.green-witch.com/acatalog/Software_Bisque.html

IGMC
 

aberal

Guru
Location
Midlothian
that is points. Lots of points!!!!

http://www.johnlewis...05/Product.aspx - any thoughts?

You gets what you pays for. To be frank - a tripod for a SLR should start around the £100 mark, at least. It's the build quality which is lacking in the cheaper tripods to the extent that you are better off not spending the dosh at all than spending too little. Mafrotto, Giottos or Redsnapper are the names to look out for, for decent mid-range tripods - they'll last years and do the job perfectly. Anything cheap is just going to be nasty.
 

MontyVeda

a short-tempered ill-controlled small-minded troll
+1 for a bean bag, especially for SLR's rather than compact cameras... it's worth having one a suitable size for your camera as well as a tripod as this allows mounting your camera at floor level, with a nice beany fine angle adjust :smile:
 

Norm

Guest
I've got a gorillapod which works well if there is something of suitable height to use. I also asked Mrs Norm to make me some bean bags in various (small) sizes, which are also great when there's something at a handy height. You can always get the support you need under the body and lens with a decent bean bag. I usually have a couple in the car, they are superb at placing on car bodywork which is never at just the right angle.

I've got a fecking great Benbo which is unrivalled as long as you don't need to carry it anywhere. It's great for getting the camera into strange angles and positions, macro photography setting it up a few inches above the ground or a few cms above a table. Strangely, though, I can never get the Benbo exactly where I want it in a studio, so I've got a Manfrotto too.

I've got some cheap-ish tripods which work ok in the field if you can hang something fairly heavy under the middle of them - it's a good place to store your camera bag when you are working. You can make even flimsy tripods fairly solid by doing that.

When I'm out'n'about, though, I use monopods. My favourite is an old CamCane, although I haven't seen them for sale for a little while.
 
Top Bottom