Putting on my Tim Farron hat (it's ginger and makes you invisible) I can see both sides. Joe and Joanna public probably don't know or care about the distinctions between Team Sky, the GB Track cycling team and, if they've heard of it at all, British Cycling. The branding has been very effective at creating the appearance of a single, monolithic British success machine. By muddying the branding waters, it might confuse and dilute the message.The 'arms length' relationship between BC and Team Sky/Sky Pro Cycling is only blurred if you don't understand it. Anyway, that's why you have highly-paid laywers, to sort all that stuff out.
Hypothetically, a deal with Virgin, Talk-Talk, EE, Vodafone, O2 or similar may have seemed 'messy' to some, but BC's contract with BSkyB would not have precluded such a thing from happening if it came to it, I would have thought. I doubt there would have been any obvious legal barrier to prevent it from happening.
On the other hand, BC and Sky are commercial entities and are entitled to renew, renegotiate or expire contracts as they see fit. There's no history or tradition to stomp over. It's not like they're trying to rebrand ManU as Yanmar Tractor Allstars.
Last edited by a moderator: