HJ
Cycling in Scotland
- Location
- Auld Reekie
Very diplomatic reply BTFB...
Ideal for staggering from the pub back to your campsite down the laneBigtallfatbloke said:At night I have the reflectiveness of the jacket so the hi vis vest is not needed then.
Bigtallfatbloke said:..exactly!
It arrived about 30 minutes ago...xxxl fits well...all seems well...only thing I'd change would be to add a hood...but it's no big deal.
Hairy Jock said:A true drivers answer. Obviously you don't cycle much at night, the colour of your jacket makes no different, at night it is the number and brightness of your lights that counts.
Tynan said:I'm posting what i think about their reasons, they're avoiding the simple facts of the debate as opposed to opinions
and avoiding the facts for good reasons I suggest
Tynan said:all the dancing around the question, yes reflectives are essential in the dark as are lights and reflectors, no argument, ditto positioning etc etc
but does bright clothing make you that bit safer? especially in low light such as street lighting or dusk?
again, this sounds just like the helmet argument where people make up all sorts of arguments against wearing a helmet and dance all round the issue without addressing it because they they simply don't want to wear one for whatever reason
I've no problem with them not wanting to, I do with them not being honest
giant man said:No it's not a driver's answer it's a cyclist's one cos that's what i am. I am not going to believe that you can see a black jacket (with as many reflective strips as you want) better than a hi vis one in the dark. Your argument doesn't make any sense mate.
Oh sorry i just saw you've been cycling in the dark for so many years, ah well you must be right then mustn't you?