If the number of cyclists is rising then unfortunately the number of casualties will increase, it would be nice to see the numbers of cyclists increase & the number of casualties decrease, but with such a vehicle centric world it's not going to happen for a long time.
If the number of cyclists is rising then unfortunately the number of casualties will increase, it would be nice to see the numbers of cyclists increase & the number of casualties decrease, but with such a vehicle centric world it's not going to happen for a long time.
There is a theory that it'll happen sooner than you think, called "safety in numbers", where there are enough people cycling that motorists start to expect them and look for them at junctions and so on, removing a lot of SMIDSYs from the statistics.
There is a theory that it'll happen sooner than you think, called "safety in numbers", where there are enough people cycling that motorists start to expect them and look for them at junctions and so on, removing a lot of SMIDSYs from the statistics.
If the number of cyclists is rising then unfortunately the number of casualties will increase, it would be nice to see the numbers of cyclists increase & the number of casualties decrease, but with such a vehicle centric world it's not going to happen for a long time.
Indeed, but the number of registered vehicles has fallen slightly, so there are less vehicles to go around punting cyclists up the road. Add to the formula that the amount of road miles covered per average motor vehicle has fallen markedly over the last decade, particularly for private vehicles, and things don't look rosy on the splattered cyclist front.
At least they've just stopped short of the Daily Mail, who would have given it the byline.."What cycling scum should do when knocked off their bike by a road tax paying Volvo driver..."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.