If you can get past the shonky journalism there are some interesting footfall numbers on the Oxford Mail website.
The takeaways are that on Monday (the day the consumptive flood gates were once more thrown open) city centre footfall was up by 70% on the previous week, while still 70% down on the same time last year.
Tbh I think it's pretty heartening that there were only around 30% of the people in the city centre compared to last year; while a good chunk of the difference can probably be explained by people still off work and an absence of international tourists, I find it encouraging that many are apparently still staying away despite government encouragement to do the opposite.
I'd also expect numbers to have been higher on Monday due to "pent up demand", so ongoing the footfall may be even lower for a while.
By contrast however, apparently the horror that is Bicester village retail outlet has been crammed with people - natural selection I guess; if not necessarily for those showing such little concern, for their vulnerable friends and relatives by proxy
The takeaways are that on Monday (the day the consumptive flood gates were once more thrown open) city centre footfall was up by 70% on the previous week, while still 70% down on the same time last year.
Tbh I think it's pretty heartening that there were only around 30% of the people in the city centre compared to last year; while a good chunk of the difference can probably be explained by people still off work and an absence of international tourists, I find it encouraging that many are apparently still staying away despite government encouragement to do the opposite.
I'd also expect numbers to have been higher on Monday due to "pent up demand", so ongoing the footfall may be even lower for a while.
By contrast however, apparently the horror that is Bicester village retail outlet has been crammed with people - natural selection I guess; if not necessarily for those showing such little concern, for their vulnerable friends and relatives by proxy