I agree with winjim's observations and would add that the visibility of cyclists is *not* a problem, driver behaviour is: they either fail to look, look but fail to see, or don't give a feck.
But addressing driver behaviour is seen as too big a challenge so people (in this case your ED&D teacher) take the easy way out and pass responsibility to the victims. They turn their back on the problem and look at who's affected by it.
Your offerings are worthless trinkets, all of which have been available for years and do nothing to improve safety in cycling. I wouldn't use them if they were free.
Cycling itself isn't dangerous, you have to look at who/what brings the danger to the road environment and change that.
Despite my lack of interest in your products, I did complete your survey. The question asking "On a scale from 1 to 5 how safe and visible do you feel while cycling?" is badly framed and should be separated into its constituent parts. For example, I am very visible on the roads but feel only moderately safe because, despite my best efforts, drivers still fail to see me. I can't give a single score for these two factors combined.
I appreciate this is a school project and has value in showing you the process of design and development of a product, I just wish your teacher had come up with an idea that would be of practical benefit to cycling.
Have you circulated your survey to those places in Europe where cycling activity is very high, such as Amsterdam?