Plus the rumoured 22000 jobs it will create and all the supply companies for materials etc.The OP is made under a false premise.
There is not a pot of £106billion waiting to be spent on something.
Some of the cost has been raised commercially from the project itself.
Thus if we didn't have HS2, we wouldn't have all that finance.
But there's no doubt a lot of public money will be spent, and there's good arguments for spending that elsewhere.
As there always is with any large project.
Affordable housing that doesn't get flogged off.Such as ???
Where would you spend it ?
HS2 has a number of benefits...
It classic Keynesian economics to pump the system
You've been reading too much Daily Wail, the protesters friend.More of a shame for the SSSI , Ancient woodlands , nature reserves that now find they are in the way. Not to forgetting the odd new housing estate, bit's of newly open canal oh and most of a scout camp along the way.
No just looked at how things are for myself and what it all means for around my way. I'm not bothered about price of my house brigade and I don't want my view being spoilt by the pin pick train line in the distance.You've been reading too much Daily Wail, the protesters friend.
Why would it? Neither have ever been part of HS2, and the latter has always been touted as a separate scheme (HS3 anyone?).If the costs include adding new track/ replacing all existing rails/ smoothing out curves and improving banking on the entire East and West Coast mainlines then improvements can be made... but the route description link below makes no mention of improving branch lines or existing tracks. Nor does it mention improving the vital cross country routes.
https://www.hs2.org.uk/where/route-map-described/