I don't run lights, but you are correct that I own the road. It's a much better deal than owning the underside of a bridgeYou run lights, weave through traffic like you own the road.
I don't run lights, but you are correct that I own the road. It's a much better deal than owning the underside of a bridgeYou run lights, weave through traffic like you own the road.
You ride 2 or 3 next to each other, so cars can't pass you
So I didn't know why you kept toting on about yellow jackets, so I watched some videos of cyclists in London. I realize this may not go over so well, but you guys don't think there's any issues with your cycling habits there at all? Quite honestly, I'm surprised you don't get hit more often.
Call me crazy, but I recognize the fact that a car can kill me, just like when I drive I recognize that a huge truck can smash me to pieces too, and I cycle defensively, aware of that, doing my best to avoid cars.
You all cut cars off everywhere and give them the finger if they call you on it. You ride 2 or 3 next to each other, so cars can't pass you. You run lights, weave through traffic like you own the road. I've never seen anything like it before.
Maybe this isn't everywhere in England, but it seemed to be pretty common in London.
And yes, I did see cyclists wearing bright yellow, mainly at night, and officers wearing it during the day. But let's just say hi vis won't protect a cyclist from getting hit and killed, who completely disregards the laws of physics and traffic lights too.
:
- strengthened road policing with a return to greater number of officers on patrol;
- strict application of the 12-point totting up disqualfication process;
- removal of the exceptional hardship clause;
- mandatory retesting of all drivers who seek return of their licence after disqualification.
Mostly agree - so wouldn't you alsoStudies like http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/12855/ and the failure of the fluctuations in hi-vis cycle clothing sales to correlate with any measures of cycling casualties. You know, science.
Also, I think you'd need to be a special sort of crazy to wear yellow and go cycling among all the yellow crops we grow around here.
I can't make it "more possible for me to be seen". We can all be seen. We're all visible. Except maybe the invisible man. Any motorist claiming otherwise is probably trying to distract from a mistake.
However, dressing as an alien space lemon has other drawbacks, making cycling seen as something that involves special clothes and making cyclists seen as unusual abnormal people. This means people are less likely to think of cycling as something they could or should do.
Edited to add: oh and it uglies up landscapes and people's photographs, which is a bit unwelcome in a tourist area.
That's why it's top of my list.The first one (enforcement) is the most important.
Indeed. This can be seen in the continued prevalence of people driving while using a hand-held phone, despite the penalty having been doubled.To get behavioural change, the certain consequence of a "minor" penalty is much more effective than the small risk of a draconian one.
Mostly agree - so wouldn't you also
need to be a special sort of crazy to wear Black and go cycling among all the Blackness we have at night in the country around here.
Surely the point is CONTRAST. Likewise unwise to wear white if you want to be seen in snow. Like some others I also find I am often able to see riders wearing lighter or reflective clothing earlier when driving at night on country roads.
Not breaking any laws by riding 5 abreast, which I've done. It's discouraged by the highway code but it happens almost inevitably for short stretches in towns and mostly cities where enough people cycle to shoal at traffic lights and so in. It still doesn't excuse bad driving.1: You are not breaking any laws in the UK by riding 2 abreast.
Sure there are issues and I do include cycle training as something that would help - but remember that the videos that get put online are mostly stuff that is exceptional or remarkable in some way and often that's bad cycling or bad motoring. Maybe you could look at the videos posted of cyclists in your capital city and see if that seems a fair representation of how you cycle?So I didn't know why you kept toting on about yellow jackets, so I watched some videos of cyclists in London. I realize this may not go over so well, but you guys don't think there's any issues with your cycling habits there at all? Quite honestly, I'm surprised you don't get hit more often.
And no-one has a problem with any of that. It's just the naïve and mistaken belief that the emperor's new cycling jacket will do anything to stop them and so such victim-blaming unnecessary expensive fashion statements should be promoted to other cyclists.Call me crazy, but I recognize the fact that a car can kill me, just like when I drive I recognize that a huge truck can smash me to pieces too, and I cycle defensively, aware of that, doing my best to avoid cars.
YYSW, like all Yankees are fat and don't have passports.You all cut cars off everywhere and give them the finger if they call you on it.
Ye gods! You're going to cough up your skull when you discover videos of cycling in the Netherlands!You ride 2 or 3 next to each other, so cars can't pass you. You run lights, weave through traffic like you own the road. I've never seen anything like it before.
I do get more room, like I said, I definitely get a wider gerth...
I definitely get a wider gerth
Ah but you're not a manYou can call me vain, but I am not going to choose cycling clothing that increases my girth.
As for riding 2 or 3 next to each other well 3 is not good but nothing wrong with 2 abreast conditions allowing may i ask are you even a cyclist?
Sure there are issues and I do include cycle training as something that would help - but remember that the videos that get put online are mostly stuff that is exceptional or remarkable in some way and often that's bad cycling or bad motoring. Maybe you could look at the videos posted of cyclists in your capital city and see if that seems a fair representation of how you cycle?
And anyway, does someone who makes a mistake while cycling deserve the death penalty?
It's just the naïve and mistaken belief that the emperor's new cycling jacket will do anything to stop them and so such victim-blaming unnecessary expensive fashion statements should be promoted to other cyclists.