Beer?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

rich p

ridiculous old lush
Location
Brighton
We're slipping onto page 2 chaps, and even though it's a school day - could do better. You can't always rely on Mossy...:whistle:

Anyway, I had a tower of beers tonight in tinnies. It still seems weird and lacking in dignity but who am I to hold back progress:rolleyes:

3 Guns and the regular grapefruit. The smoky Pale Ale was nice and nicely understated. Or subtle.
20170207_183336.jpg
 

John the Monkey

Frivolous Cyclist
Location
Crewe
Thornbridge make some nice beers - but 330ml is a pain - too small to share between Mrs M and I. I also think that there are brewers (for now, at least) still bottling IPAs at least as good as (f'rinstance) Jaipur or Kipling in 500ml. So for me, it'll be on to those beers, away from Thornbridge.
 

nickyboy

Norven Mankey
This 330ml/500ml dilemma....

In my usual unscientific way I suspect it boils down to our deep-rooted psychology of what constitutes a "normal" quantity of a beer. Pints. 330ml just feels a bit.....small. Of course, like in the link @John the Monkey provided, there is a cut off on beer strength. I wouldn't drink a pint of 7% so I don't expect a bottle of the stuff to be 500ml

In the same way, 500ml is not popular on the continent it seems. Could never find a bar doing half litres when I was in Amsterdam
 

John the Monkey

Frivolous Cyclist
Location
Crewe
Is one each too much?
Depends on what it is really. Mrs M, as the sensible one, would question the wisdom of 660ml of Jaipur when we could have bought 500ml of Oakham Inferno (f'rinstance). (We've already tried them both, we know we like them both). She'd probably be ok with 660ml of Nightmare on Bold Street though, as it's a bloody nice stout (she's a fan), and there's not much like it bottled in 500ml.
 
Top Bottom