GrumpyGregry
Here for rides.
Because insurers are in cahoots with govt. Because insurers look at personal lines in the round. Because insurers hardly ever make money from underwriting once the claims are settled. Motor insurance is a legal requirement, household isn't, and the MIB picks up the tab for uninsured drivers so the whole industry is rather uninterested in raising premiums beyond the level the market will bear. No one sane wants masses of uninsured drivers on the road.Of course, given that vehicle insurance payouts were far greater than income from policy payments in 2010 should we really not be asking about he wisdom of a 90% discount?
2 billion pounds was diverted from household and other insurance to prop up the motor insurance...........why should householders subsidise any driver's insurance no matter how safe they are
and no, if they can't get insurance they aren't going to stop driving. Until 3rd party insurance is levied via a duty on fuel we are lumbered with a broken system, where someone, be it householders or drivers like me with a currently claim free record*, subsidise the idiots.
I've owned my cheap to insure car for four years. This year I will have paid insurance premiums which, in total over four years, exceed the price I paid for the car.