Asset protection trusts re care home fees - what do we think?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Beebo

Firm and Fruity
Location
Hexleybeef
I gather there is another proviso as to whether the LA can use the house funds ...are there any under 18s , it may be under 16s, resident. They cannot make minors effectively homeless was the logic.

Feel free to correct me, pretty sure it used to be a condition in effect but may be wrong

I believe they put a charge on the house, so that funds revert to the council when it is sold.
So no one is made homeless and the house isn’t forcibly sold.
 
OP
OP
T4tomo

T4tomo

Legendary Member
I believe they put a charge on the house, so that funds revert to the council when it is sold.
So no one is made homeless and the house isn’t forcibly sold.

correct.

Moving a 60+ year old relative in protects it though. Struggling to get me sister to agree to leave her husband and live with me Mam though....
 

fossyant

Ride It Like You Stole It!
Location
South Manchester
We had about 4 -6 weeks notification that we needed to find one .

You don't get long sometimes. MIL had a fall, ended up in hospital, then onto a respite unit for some time. She decided she wasn't doing the rehab to get moving again, so that unfortunately forced the family's hand and she has to go into Nursing care as she couldn't be cared for at home - needed hoisting from bed to wheelchair, then wheelchair to chair, and that needed two carers at a time, which wasn't possible in her house.

Costs were £50k per year even with Local Authority covering some of the cost. We did get to chose a home, it was nice but a bit too big - i.e. lots of patients and associated staffing shortages.
 

Emanresu

I asked AI to show the 'real' me.
Have you checked the life expectancy of people who actually live in care homes? As soon as you need one, you're on the slippery slope. Have a look at section 4 / Figure 2.

There is a balance between asset protection and quality of life. If a relative goes on about Asset Protection send them to a care home for a month's respite. They'll be able to judge the issue for themselves if AP is the way they want to go.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...pectancyincarehomesenglandandwales/2021to2022
 
You can always look after the person yourself and then keep the house.
When my Mum had a massive stroke and was at end of life I had a right battle on with the hospital to keep her there for a few days to die in peace. I seriously wouldn't wish this on anyone. It was really appalling.
A neighbour has just gone into a care home and its 1.5K a week.
 

Beebo

Firm and Fruity
Location
Hexleybeef
Have you checked the life expectancy of people who actually live in care homes? As soon as you need one, you're on the slippery slope. Have a look at section 4 / Figure 2.

There is a balance between asset protection and quality of life. If a relative goes on about Asset Protection send them to a care home for a month's respite. They'll be able to judge the issue for themselves if AP is the way they want to go.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...pectancyincarehomesenglandandwales/2021to2022

I agree that the usual life expectancy of some one in a care home is likely to be fairly short. But even 2 years could cost £150k.

The “nightmare” scenario for someone is they live for 8-10 years and run up a £700k bill whilst having a very poor quality of life. But that is fairly rare.
 
I agree that the usual life expectancy of some one in a care home is likely to be fairly short. But even 2 years could cost £150k.

The “nightmare” scenario for someone is they live for 8-10 years and run up a £700k bill whilst having a very poor quality of life. But that is fairly rare.

I don't know, I've known quite a few elderly people with bad dementia living for years in care homes.
 

All uphill

Still rolling along
Location
Somerset
I get annoyed when I hear people saying they should have a 'right' to pass on their wealth to their children, even if they need care later in life.

Why would we expect taxpayers to pay for us to be looked after if we have assets?
 
OP
OP
T4tomo

T4tomo

Legendary Member
I get annoyed when I hear people saying they should have a 'right' to pass on their wealth to their children, even if they need care later in life.

Why would we expect taxpayers to pay for us to be looked after if we have assets?

Take politics to the appropriate place, i.e not on cyclechat
 
I get annoyed when I hear people saying they should have a 'right' to pass on their wealth to their children, even if they need care later in life.

Why would we expect taxpayers to pay for us to be looked after if we have assets?

Because those people have worked hard for their assets and their children may have looked after them for years. I think its very unfair that they have to lose their homes when someone who has never worked gets it all for free. How's that fair? the person with the house will most likely have worked and paid a fair bit in tax and NI.
 

Bonefish Blues

Banging donk
Location
52 Festive Road
Because those people have worked hard for their assets and their children may have looked after them for years. I think its very unfair that they have to lose their homes when someone who has never worked gets it all for free. How's that fair? the person with the house will most likely have worked and paid a fair bit in tax and NI.

If you have no money you have no choice over where you spend your final months. Assets/cash buys you choice. Seems fair to me.
 
Top Bottom