Armstrong charged and banned

Status
Not open for further replies.
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

lukesdad

Guest
UCI tried to get control of this case and failed. What do you mean 'only one option'?

Read between the lines, its a challenge.
 

thom

____
Location
The Borough
UCI tried to get control of this case and failed. What do you mean 'only one option'?
I think the implication is that the UCI would withdraw from WADA oversight and hence as a sport they would not be able to be part of the Olympics.
We'll see but I think it's an absurd idea personally.
More likely in my opinion is that if something sticks to the UCI itself as involved in wrongdoing/coverup, there will be refactoring within the UCI.
 

Hont

Guru
Location
Bromsgrove
If he's stripped of the titles, who gets them?

That's surely a distraction to the main point. When you have the evidence you have to proceed until the end, otherwise no justice is done, no message is sent and the public remain unenlightened. If they have to declare no winner for those seven tours then so be it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BJH

asterix

Comrade Member
Location
Limoges or York
You reckon Big Mig was clean?

He's my number 1 cycling hero, but I don't reckon he was clean...

No, I wouldn't go bail for him, either.

When it comes to cycling heroes, although he can look a bit of a drip, I'd have to go for Cadel Evans. Impossible to believe he would cheat.
 

raindog

er.....
Location
France
QOTD (from cyclingnews.com):

Another French cycling celebrity, Bernard Hinault, gave his very pesonal view: "I don't f***ing care. It's his problem not mine. It's a problem that should have been solved 10 or 15 years ago and that wasn't."

:laugh: love the bloke - most of the time anyway.
 
OP
OP
Y

yello

Guest
QOTD (from cyclingnews.com):

Another French cycling celebrity, Bernard Hinault, gave his very pesonal view: "I don't f***ing care. It's his problem not mine. It's a problem that should have been solved 10 or 15 years ago and that wasn't."

Cool.

Hadn't thought of it before, but I'm looking forward to other peloton exs feeling free to speak their minds.
 

lukesdad

Guest
I think the implication is that the UCI would withdraw from WADA oversight and hence as a sport they would not be able to be part of the Olympics.
We'll see but I think it's an absurd idea personally.
More likely in my opinion is that if something sticks to the UCI itself as involved in wrongdoing/coverup, there will be refactoring within the UCI.

Hmm , unlike athletics and swimmimg the Olympics is not regarded as the pinnacle in pro-cycling. One way or the other pro cycling is going to change, I would like to think in the way you suggest, recent history however does not install me with confidence.
 
I think the implication is that the UCI would withdraw from WADA oversight and hence as a sport they would not be able to be part of the Olympics.
We'll see but I think it's an absurd idea personally.
More likely in my opinion is that if something sticks to the UCI itself as involved in wrongdoing/coverup, there will be refactoring within the UCI.
It's quite a stretch to get to that conclusion from the UCI statement. That's not reading between the lines, that's just making stuff up from scratch. There is no way that UCI will risk Olympic status, even if the WADA code chafes occasionally.
 
Hmm , unlike athletics and swimmimg the Olympics is not regarded as the pinnacle in pro-cycling. One way or the other pro cycling is going to change, I would like to think in the way you suggest, recent history however does not install me with confidence.
Not the pinnacle? Two things:- 1) the riders who contested the road race and the time trial might want to argue with you on that point and 2) who do you think oversees track cycling, the Chuckle Brothers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom