threebikesmcginty
Corn Fed Hick...
- Location
- ...on the slake
No. He's already playing Jonathan Vaughters. Robert Carlyle as Begsie - that's a better match for Lance.
Actually, how about Richard E Grant's Withnail?
No. He's already playing Jonathan Vaughters. Robert Carlyle as Begsie - that's a better match for Lance.
UCI tried to get control of this case and failed. What do you mean 'only one option'?
You reckon Big Mig was clean?Is it therefore true that since 1995 (Miguel Indurain) only in 3, recent, years have riders (Carlos Sastre, Cadel Evans and Bradley Wiggins) won the Tour clean?
You reckon Big Mig was clean?
He's my number 1 cycling hero, but I don't reckon he was clean...
.......before he got caught too?Have heard plenty stay the same, and indeed his increase in performance one of the primary reasons why Lemond decided to knock it on the head.
I think the implication is that the UCI would withdraw from WADA oversight and hence as a sport they would not be able to be part of the Olympics.UCI tried to get control of this case and failed. What do you mean 'only one option'?
If he's stripped of the titles, who gets them?
You reckon Big Mig was clean?
He's my number 1 cycling hero, but I don't reckon he was clean...
QOTD (from cyclingnews.com):
Another French cycling celebrity, Bernard Hinault, gave his very pesonal view: "I don't f***ing care. It's his problem not mine. It's a problem that should have been solved 10 or 15 years ago and that wasn't."
QOTD (from cyclingnews.com):
Another French cycling celebrity, Bernard Hinault, gave his very pesonal view: "I don't f***ing care. It's his problem not mine. It's a problem that should have been solved 10 or 15 years ago and that wasn't."
I think the implication is that the UCI would withdraw from WADA oversight and hence as a sport they would not be able to be part of the Olympics.
We'll see but I think it's an absurd idea personally.
More likely in my opinion is that if something sticks to the UCI itself as involved in wrongdoing/coverup, there will be refactoring within the UCI.
It's quite a stretch to get to that conclusion from the UCI statement. That's not reading between the lines, that's just making stuff up from scratch. There is no way that UCI will risk Olympic status, even if the WADA code chafes occasionally.I think the implication is that the UCI would withdraw from WADA oversight and hence as a sport they would not be able to be part of the Olympics.
We'll see but I think it's an absurd idea personally.
More likely in my opinion is that if something sticks to the UCI itself as involved in wrongdoing/coverup, there will be refactoring within the UCI.
Not the pinnacle? Two things:- 1) the riders who contested the road race and the time trial might want to argue with you on that point and 2) who do you think oversees track cycling, the Chuckle Brothers?Hmm , unlike athletics and swimmimg the Olympics is not regarded as the pinnacle in pro-cycling. One way or the other pro cycling is going to change, I would like to think in the way you suggest, recent history however does not install me with confidence.