You're good at twisting words to a meaning that suits you, I'll give you that. And trying to divert attention from the salient issue too.
Do you honestly expect us to believe that you used the expression 'held secret' with absolutely no intention to create the implication that USADA are acting in a clandestine manner? Or acting in a manner other than to agreed and set-out procedures?
I think your fevered imagination is working overtime. Words mean what they mean and the OED definition of "secret" is:
"Kept from public knowledge, or from the knowledge of persons specified; not allowed to be known, or only by selected persons"
And it remains kept secret until it is released and becomes public. Even UCI do not know what is in it and at one stage USADA were not intending to let Armstrong know so he could prepare his defence (although Judge Sparks got them to change that stance and give assurances otherwise). To claim the evidence is other than secret at present is the real twisting of words from their natural meanings.