MontyVeda
a short-tempered ill-controlled small-minded troll
- Location
- Lancaster... the little city.
from what i can gather, the cyclists who are complaining are cyclists who regularly used that stretch of the A6 before the cones were put in place, and now they think it's worse, so much so they're saying that they don't use the coned area and stick to the main part of the road....
Are the regular cyclists there thinking? If there were no cones to get knocked over, motorists would be invading the lane at best and knocking cyclists off at worst, wouldn't they? And the cones knocked over don't render it useless after the first person knocks them to the kerb, but it would be better if they'd painted a solid white line between the cones so the lane had legal effect even when the cones were down and it would help you to spot any bases left attached to the road after the vandals have attacked.
Is the key test whether the regular cyclists use them (who already cycle despite the current crap road designs) or whether they encourage more cyclists?
I don't think it's all vandalism either, I reckon the cones are getting clipped by drivers when they're pulling over to let emergency services through, or just veering off course when they're sending a text or taking a selfie.
I see cones knocked out on a daily basis (they get put back each morning i guess)... not the number in the photo from a few weeks ago but even one or two cones rolling around would put me off using the lane. If I was considering taking up commuting by bike, there's nothing about that lane that would make me think... yeah, that looks ideal.