"Did report", note the past tense. This is all very confusing. Saugy has more recently reported as saying the samples were from anonymous riders. From that same article...
My assumption was that they couldn't be identified, so why he told the FDA that they were Armstrong's is just weird. But then, equally as odd, is why they claim to have spoken to both Bruyneel and Armstrong about the results and/or EPO tests generally - whether the samples were known to be from Armstrong or not. It's just not adding up is it?
Last week he confirmed to the Neue Zürcher Zeitung that there were four “suspicious” samples, but that they were anonymous
My assumption was that they couldn't be identified, so why he told the FDA that they were Armstrong's is just weird. But then, equally as odd, is why they claim to have spoken to both Bruyneel and Armstrong about the results and/or EPO tests generally - whether the samples were known to be from Armstrong or not. It's just not adding up is it?