Slick
Guru
I don't think so.It would be funny if it weren't so appalling.
I don't think so.It would be funny if it weren't so appalling.
Like @Slick with my link, I couldn't get through that article.See also the case of 5yr old Lennon Toland, killed on a pavement by a van driver accessing a makeshift car park. Council subsequently installed bollards to block it but they were ripped out by vandals and that company's vans are still using it. Nobody was even charged, let alone tried.
I'm not asking them to use "mown down". In fact, I'd rather the BBC never used that tabloid language. But how about "knocked down" for the cyclist, and "run over" for the van driver?The driver was found not guilty, thus you need to be careful how you describe the incident.
What motorists get away with is a seperate discussion
Using it as context is fair enough but if the discussion continues to be about the incident with the van rather than the one with the cyclist then it will need to be in a thread of its own.No it isn’t. It’s context that helps to understand the story. Yes, the cyclist is guilty of a crime but the 27 week sentence is ridiculously excessive and looking at comparable cases and the way they are reported helps to highlight the underlying anti-cyclist agenda.
I don't think anyone thinks he is hard done by.I cant see how anyone can think he was hard done by .
I don't think anyone thinks he is hard done by.
I do. I think the sentence is wildly excessive and I’m disappointed that the general kneejerk reaction is hang’im and flog’im.
I agree. He's a young idiot and should be held to account, but six months reflects a vengeful hysteria among the population at large rather than even an attempt at justice. The question is not whether it's 'fair' - you can argue about that endlessly without getting anywhere - but whether it's proportionate to sentences for comparable offences. When, as noted above, a driver can be let off scot-free after crushing a child on a pavement, it's hard to see how the answer can be anything but no.I do. I think the sentence is wildly excessive and I’m disappointed that the general kneejerk reaction is hang’im and flog’im.
That's not how we do justice in our society.I don't think the parents of the child would agree with you.
I don't think the parents of the child would agree with you.